Submitted by Tyron Parsons | 1:33 PM ET on July 27, 2016
As many on my list are well aware, Anna and I have gone round and round on practically every issue of importance under the sun.
I first became aware of Anna by reading some articles of hers posted by David Robertson at his Maine Email Alert site a little over a year ago. David is a very thoughtful and kind soul. He's a man of courage and intellect. He has also been in the battle to free us Americans for a long time; most of his expertise in matters of money and the 'Federal Reserve", so upon reading Anna's writings and being exposed to her many claims, naturally my interest was peaked.
From the outset something didn't seem right about Anna. Some of her claims were obviously tainted by a political bias (can't necessarily hold that against people) so I kept an open mind and continued reading. After a short period of time things she said really began to bother me especially when she justified her positions from a typically Jewish, Marxist perspective. Thus began my "correspondence" with Anna.
In the beginning it was cordial. The topics discussed and debated were done so with an eye toward establishing the truth, but in a short period of time points obviously gained by myself gave way to a tidal wave of slanderous attacks by her. Not just the run of the mill attacks. Demonizing slanders over literally hundreds of emails such as I was an evil hater, a white supremacist, a bigot, a misogynist, a Nazi and every other low blow one could imagine. At first I ignored them and stuck to the issues. After all, I was dealing with a female and I don't make a habit of throwing the same name calling (truth or not) at women as I might respond to a man. But after a while it became very clear that many of the issues she claimed to have the truth about were not truth at all, but rather political and religious opinions contradicted by the very sources she spoke for as if having exclusive authority over. And thus, as time went on and her slanders against my race, my gender, my person became increased, I too become increased. I became totally hardened and resolved to use every tactic she felt she was at liberty to use against me to expose this person for the sake of all whom believe her.
Call me what you want but I certainly feel the old "equality" principal when debating those who claim all is equal but then decided that it's not fair when another "equal" uses their same tactics.
I could go into what you all know.I could bring up her claiming to be a not a Jewess and then a white women and then a Jewess again. I could go on and on about the mountains of perfectly contradicting statements and positions she's held which she finds absolutely problem with in the least. I could bring up her endless white people hating, man hating hypocrisy but all who've read these emails are well aware of those things. So allow me to get to the root of the root of the issue in contention because upon this issue rests the truth of the rest; whether Anna is a con-women, a false opposition agent, a fraud, or if she is simply a women living in Alaska fighting the good fight to protect the American people.
Anna has a list of articles at her site. She's taken on her nay sayers and always claims (without ever citing anything, including from where she derives her authority) that they are all wrong, she is 100% correct, they have no proof to dispute her, especially when it comes to those who claim she isn't a Judge under our common law. She seems to have addressed many of other people's points of contention but funny enough, she NEVER addresses my points of fact exposing her for not being who she claims to be.
Here is the challenge to which if she refuses, she's effectively telling everyone I am right and she's a fraud.
I challenge Anna to write an article,with specific citations posted to her site that addresses my charge that she is not a judge under our common law for the following reasons.
1. The law of the land in America is Anglo-Saxon, Common, Natural, Christian (NT) law.
2. Our law is inherently Patriarchal and specifically used to Govern our ethnic, racial peoples- whites/European Americans who are the founding, reigning stock of America and all of her lawful Governments.
3.Women are not to hold positions of public authority over men according to our Christian NT law and this is backed by the law of nature as well as our common law traditions (until the advent of the US Corporation 1871).
4. No women has ever held a position of judge under our law from the time of the advent of the Apostles and early Christian Church (Not RCC) - from America's founding, up to the advent of the legal fiction code system that she says she opposes.
So here's your chance Anna to set the record straight. Post an article addressing IN SPECIFICS those 4 points refuting with citations why I am wrong and you are right and then allow me to rebut your points to be printed on your article for everyone to see and decide for themselves.
What do you say? You want to redeem yourself in many peoples eyes or shall I hold to my position of dusting off my feet from the first time I ever spoke with you?
Kind regards, Ty
Anna's reply to Ty's challenge
Here is my rebuttal Anna was to post but didn't.
Tyron wants to be special because he is male, he is white, and he claims to be an Israelite.
However, none of that is any basis for claiming to be special.
Anna lies as usual. All races are unique and both genders are unique. I happen to be a white person, a male and from the authentic tribes of Israel just like all whites/Europeans from Jacob. Whatever specialness I do have I AM/Jesus my creator/savior get's the glory, not I.
The thing that makes us special is that we are unique. If you take reference to the Bible, we are special because God knew us and loved us before we took form in our Mother's womb. It's not because we are male. Or white. Or imagine ourselves to be Israelites.
I have NEVER claimed anything other than that and YOU can't pull up a quote of mine showing different. Simply defending whites/males against your genocidal hatred is not proof of a haughty mindset. However I can pull up loads of quotes of your showing you do find yourself special. Special because you say you belong to an Indian tribe. Special because you think man is full of sin and you as a wo-men are not as you then scape goat men and whites who you claim ALL all to blame for our present condition while you give the "Jews", females and all minorities a total pass.
Your hypocrisy seems to know no bounds.
For the record, the "Lost Tribes" were never physically lost. They were spiritually lost. They still are.
No, they were lost. They lost their ethnic and spiritual identity when they adopted paganism, got booted from the land to Medes and then crossed the Caucasian Mountains flooding into Europe from about 600 BC to 200 AD leaving only a remnant of the southern tribes and one of the houses of David in the land.
They regained their spiritual identity when the 12 Apostles of white Jesus spread his word to his people who were formerly called "not his people" after being his people previously until they were banished from the land. Now, in these last days of this particular age in perfect accord with prophesy we have and are regaining our ethnic identity as real Jacob/Israel in preparation to take over the Esau 'Jews" JWO in perfect accord with the prophesy of Obediah and the 144,000 spoken of in Revelation.
They followed after the Sumerian gods of money, sex, deceit and violence--- Mammon, Molloch and Ashtoreth.
As also prophesied about these last days his people in the 'Church" would fall into the great Apostasy, worshipping the 'Jews" and acting in all manner of wickedness while claiming to be clean and upright.
Every civilization that has followed after these gods has ended badly. The Ten Tribes of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were hauled off by the Assyrians as slaves. The Egyptians, Carthaginians, Romans, Phoenicians---- and now the British Empire is going down the same road and dragging America with it.
Won't disagree with that except that it was the 12 tribes, not just the 10 and that WHITE Christendom has been preserved until these last days since the Esau 'Jews" have usurped our reign, first secretly over the last at least 200 years and now openly as they admit it and Anna protects them in their desired and ongoing physical genocide of us whites/Europeans, males, Israelites.
Some of these doomed civilizations were patriarchies and some were matriarchies, and they all fell victim just the same.
I don't believe ANY of those doomed civilizations Anna spoke of above were a Matriarchy. The one thing they got right was being a Patriarchy but now the "Jews" who ARE A MATRIARCHY (WINK, WINK) having destroyed the Patriarchy of white/European Christendom, plunging us into the Great Apostasy where our own race, especially the males are being persecuted and genocided based on our race and gender IN OUR OWN LANDS and NATIONS given to us as one of the blessings of the people (race(s) of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
It doesn't matter which sex or color takes us over the cliff: in all cases it is the worship of false gods that "brings desolation".
I won't disagree with that but that still doesn't make all races and genders unique; each one given a specific place and/or mission inside a Patriarchal order and it just so happens that the white race, being given dominion and fruitful from Adam on down are to reign and be a blessings except for the last days of each age.
Tyron doesn't get it. He thinks that patriarchy is the answer. Or white skin is the answer. Or that "bloodline" inheritance is the answer.
More lies. I know that Patriarchy is what all races are called by the creator/savior to be and I know that our white/European skin only denotes and identifies our inner DNA/Bloodline-inheritance and that for us ethnic Israelites specifically the answer to our impending genocide by the 'Jews' and their allies lies in our individual and collective return to I AM/Jesus commands.
But none of these things is the answer. Obviously. Old white men who are bloodline "Israelites" according to Tyron's reckoning------have been in power the entire time leading up to this debacle.
Obviously, white males reign over the planet until recently when the 'Jews" of Esau have usurped us proves that whites/Europeans of Christendom was/are the authentic Israelites because if were not then some other race of people would have reigned the body of this present age that we now find ourselves at the end of.
The answer is to stop worshiping false gods.
Yes, agreed such as worshipping WO-men, the 'Jews" or the RCC and their Pinko Pope whom YOU claim to be the left hand of.
Instead, Tyron is looking for scapegoats. He is blaming the blacks who have never been the dominant leaders. He is blaming the "Jews" while claiming to be one. He is even attempting to blame women, like me, who stand up to his nonsense.
Lies and more lies. As usual and as the Jewess (depending on what day she's claiming to be one or not) always does, she's now projecting her guilt, her sins upon her enemy (typical jewish tactic). I don't blame blacks except for the things they are guilty of such as mass, habitual criminality, being used by the Esau "Jews" as a battering ram of destruction against whites/Europeans-Christians. I never ONCE claimed to be a "Jew", for a 'Jew" (in the original Greek) are "those who resemble Judaites" (Esau peoples). I KNOW that whites/Europeans are the authentic Israelites/Judaites of Jacob- the 12 tribes. I also blame certain women (not all women) for falling for Satan's tricks again (us men allowed it just as Adam did before) rebelling against both God and Man (which is called Feminism), led by the "Jews" of which Anna identifies with.
The Ten Tribes are still lost, still foaming at the mouth against Judah and the Lion of Judah who remained true; they are still trying to deceive everyone and shuffle off the blame for their own iniquities, still stiff-necked, strutting around, beating their chests, proclaiming their superiority----- and pretending to be the answer to all the problems that they have created.
The 12 tribes are still lost to their ethnic identity but are awakening at a very quick rate. Many of the 12 tribes of white Israelites are also spiritually lost having not been before the Esau 'Jews" usurped us taking control of our nations and societies external programming centers, Governments and our internal financial systems. All races and genders have areas of superiority and inferiority one to the other depending on the subject matter. For example, women are generally superior to men in creating, maintaining a home and everything that goes with that. In a physical sense, women are superior to men in balancing themselves. Women are also often superior to men in their emotions but their mistake these days for most of them is placing their emotions ahead of logic/reason, just as feminists like Anna hypocritically proclaim their superiority over men based on the gender because of how they feel. Blacks are superior to whites when it comes to running and jumping and working in hot, humid climates. They are superior to whites often in an emotional sense too when it comes to not being depressed. Esau Jews are much superior to whites when it comes to finances, the material world and trickery. I could list the ways whites are superior to others (all positive and negative categories being God's handiwork) but i'd immediately be accused of being a white supremacist which goes to show how hypocritical Anna's ilk is when they feel no problem claiming the superiority of non whites and females to whites and males but whenever we claim rightly something we are better at, we are suddenly the epitome of evil.
Talk about Hegelian Dialectic.
I repeat: the problem is the worship of false gods---- money, sex, death, coercive power, violence, and deceit--- by the same men, the same "Lost Tribes" who have invited calamity upon themselves and upon every host nation for millennia. Will America escape?
See? Anna is now blaming EVERYONE'S problems EVERYWHERE on whites ("Lost tribes") and white men who can be rightly be accused of allowing the evil 'Jews" and women to usurp us as she gives a total pass for every evil on the planet to non whites, 'Jews" and females the world over!! Show me how I have been wrong in my accusations of her!!
These perverse people refuse correction and try to hide the actual problem so that it can not be forthrightly addressed ---but I am forthrightly addressing it just the same.
She calls people like me "perverse" for identifying the genocidal enemy of all whites (Israelites) males even tho I admit many of us have fallen into sin (apostasy) due to our allowing both women and the 'Jews" to usurp our position(s) of rightful, lawful authority. She called people like me "perverse" for saying that part of cure is found in returning to our Anglo-Saxon/Common/Christian law and especially the NATURAL LAW which has been turned on it's head by both 'Jews" and the feminists they created.
To Anna, the self proclaimed "common law judge" under the Patriarchal "last man standing" maxim, what I and others like me stand for is "perverse". Go figure. Again, tell me where I am wrong people...
All together now--- what is the problem that brought all these early civilizations to the dust and which is threatening our civilization now?
The worship of false gods.
Yes, false Gods like the one Anna the Jewess worships, EXACTLY!
If we want to thrive and survive we have to face facts and admit that we have been worshiping evil in our midst---- worshiping money, sex, death, violence, deceit, and coercion. We have given these things our time and our attention. We have let them cow us down like sheep. We have let nasty little vermin speak for us and do all manner of evil in our names.
If we want to thrive and survive we must return to our patriarchal Anglo-Saxon Common/Christian/NATURAL law which is I AM/jesus' law for us whites/Israelites for in doing so we return to I AM/Jesus' commands and such repentance is the KEY to our collective salvation as dictated in 2 Chronicles 7:14 if my people, who are called by my name, will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven, and I will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Next time you hear Tom T. singing about "older whiskey, younger women, and more money"---- check your values against the values of Jesus of Nazareth.
Anna would do good to humble herself. Stop proclaiming herself a Judge under our Patriarchal Anglo Saxon law. She would do good to stop trying to rule over both God and Man which is forbidden in our Christian NT law which she, as a female, is to have to no public authority over man. She would also do good to renounce her self proclaimed status of being the left hand of the Anti Christ Pope for in doing so when she prayed she would be seeking I AM/Jesus' face, leaving behind her wicked ways.
None of you men including Tyron need me to tell you what is wrong. You are just trying to avoid the Truth---- that you've been caught up in worshiping false gods.
The penalties for that are known, and you just make it harder on yourselves and everyone else by trying to find scapegoats and running around blaming and making accusations instead of confessing your sins and changing your values and living better lives.
Now isn't that the Pot calling the Kettle black?
Now to answer his so-called "challenge" to me, which is not a challenge, but an attempt to discredit me and to mislead otherwise sane people.
The law of the land in America is Anglo-Saxon, Common, Natural, Christian (NT) law.
That simply isn't true and it is ignorant to think so. The "Law of the Land" worldwide is the Law of Moses and has always been so for thousands of years. This is because Moses parted the Red Sea and walked across on dry land---- thus overcoming the Law of Noah, also known as the Law of the Sea.
The Nohide "laws" were implemented by Bush the Sr in the DC/US legal fiction codes who like all Presidents for along time, including today, are pawns of the "Jews".
NOAHIDE LAWS, Decapitation for Confessing "JESUS IS LORD"
Need I say more?
Our law is inherently Patriarchal and specifically used to Govern our ethnic, racial peoples- whites/European Americans who are the founding, reigning stock of America and all of her lawful Governments.
No, Roman Law is patriarchal and especially Roman Civil Law, which is the foreign and pagan scourge we have been living under. American Common Law has not been practiced in this country since 1939, but it is not limited by the past and does not live in the past. It lives according to fixed principles--- for example, the jury rules and has the right to nullify any law it doesn't like, and there must be an actual injured party for a controversy to exist. These principles are not rooted in any "patriarchy" nor any other requirements of foreign Roman Law.
Anna is operating under Roman law as the self professed "Left hand of the Pope" who admitted that Rome had changed their Patriarchal order to Matriarchal (allowing women in positions of authority). Our Anglo-Saxon Common/Natural/Christian law is patriarchal, is the law of the land (for example Bill of Rights comes from the Magna Carta) and this is also proved by the Apostle Pauls command about women having no authority over men in in 1 Timothy 2:12 and also in 1 Corinthians 7:4
Women are not to hold positions of public authority over men according to our Christian NT law and this is backed by the law of nature as well as our common law traditions (until the advent of the US Corporation 1871).
Tyron makes the common mistake of following the Disciple (Paul) and not the Master. Christ had 33 years to "put women in their place" and the only place He put them was close beside Him. All this clap-trap about women being subservient came from Paul, a Roman Jew raised in the pagan Roman system of patriarchy. Since I call myself a "Christian" and not a "Paulian" I follow the example and teaching of Jesus who is my Master and my only Master and I take Paul with a large grain of salt, much as I do any other man. Evil and self-serving men have used Paul's inbred prejudices as a Roman and his limitations as a man as an excuse for their own will to dominate and disrespect and oppress women. I have no respect for them nor for their motives.
Paul is an Apostles of Christ and all of the Apostles were of ONE MIND AND ACCORD. ALL of the Apostles were MALES, not ONE FEMALE PROVING THE PATRIARCHAL ORDER JUST AS ALL OF THE PATRIARCHS OF THE 12 TRIBES WERE MALE AND NOT FEMALE. Paul was of the tribe of Benjamin not an Esau 'Jew"
No women has ever held a position of judge under our law from the time of the advent of the Apostles and early Christian Church (Not RCC) - from America's founding, up to the advent of the legal fiction code system that she says she opposes.
Actually, women have always been judges and prophetesses among the Hebrews and always will be. It is the foreign, pagan, domineering law of Rome and Roman patriarchy that dictated that men be judges and which caused the despicable mistreatment of women and the promotion of sodomy and pedophilia and so many other ills. So instead of promoting more of that we are following the traditions and the principles of the Common Law itself----in which people choose their judges. If Tyron doesn't want to be judged by me because he is a woman-hater, he doesn't have to contract with me. There are plenty of male judges around, including my husband, who would love to grind a nasty misogynist like Tyron into the dirt.
Actually, women can be prophetesses but cannot hold authority over man. We are in the New Contract, not the OLD Contract where there was only one female Judge, Deborah who during the time of Judges cited her authority being from I AM whereas Anna says she worships Christ denying the New Contract and our law saying she worships 'Jesus" yet she also cites her authority from the Pope who by definition is an Anti Christ (his seal is 666). Asking women to go back to their ordained role is not hate but an act of love for Jewish feminism has been the battering ram that has destroyed the white family Christian structure (not to mention many other races families). As to her Husband, that is who she ought to be speaking through for as even Paul proclaimed it is a shame upon women who speak in the church. They should remain silent and bring up any questions they have to their husbands at home.
So, let's sum this up: Tyron Parsons and other white men who are self-admittedly calling themselves "Israelites" and claiming to be descendants of the Lost Tribes of Israel are still lost morally and spiritually.
No, we do sin, I sin, we all fall short but what separates people like myself from the likes of Anna is that we ADMIT our sins and call a spade a spade as Anna and her Esau "Jew" ilk are the one who're being boastful, hating men, being a total hypocrite as she also helps destroy the family structure in her desire to rule over both man and God.
They have caused destruction everywhere they have gone for thousands of years-----like a plague or a parasite that just keeps moving from host to host.
They have done it by worshiping false gods and adhering to wrong principles and refusing to repent their mistakes and misdeeds.
When people worship false gods, things predictably go to pot.
WOW, just WOW. See what I mean? White males are to blame for all of the world's woes for "thousands of years" and this as she worships the Esau Jew, her own gender and is the self professed left hand of the Anti Christ Pope.
Instead of looking for scapegoats, they should be tearing down the "Statue of Liberty" which is nothing but a giant effigy of Ashtoreth, the Mother of Harlots and All Abominations and the Washington Monument which is nothing but a dead man's severed penis in effigy, too. Why not send both those symbols of their foreign, pagan religion back to France and the Freemasons they came from?
The abomination that causes desolation is the "messiah" the main Anti Christ that the 'Jews" the Anti Christ Pope and Anna seek to install in 'Israel" in place of the authentic Jesus Christ who will take over their JWO with 144,000 hand picked white/European Israelites in perfect accord with Obediah and Revelation.
That would at least symbolically address the real problem.
When we do overcome (And I can only HOPE to be one of them) it will LITERALLY address all of our and the world's problems for when this happens we whites/Europeans will ACTUALLY get our inheritance back that the 'Jews" and the Anti Christ Pope have stolen from us which Anna says she is trying to secure back for us with her filings and pleadings for us which will NEVER HAPPEN!
Notice, Anna won't post this to her cite because she knows that in doing so, she will lost many/most of her misled followers.
Here is Anna's challenge to me
Here is my response to Anna's challenge which again, she refused to post to her site.
ANNA in Red
Ty in Black
Most people can’t tell cow patties from shoe shine, but it is important that everyone learn.
We have to learn to recognize it when we are seeing things through a filter—-a fact or set of facts overlaying the actual truth, which then leads us to wrong conclusions. The most common and deadly filter is a half-truth.
Satan told Eve a half-truth when he told her she wouldn’t die from eating the forbidden fruit. Well, she didn’t die, did she? Not right away….
Everyone knows that Cain was Adam’s son, because he was the brother of Abel, right? Yet, Cain doesn’t appear in the long list of Adam’s sons.
It’s half-truth to say that Cain was Abel’s brother, because Cain was a half-brother.
The writings of Paul of Tarsus fill a considerable portion of the Bible and they similarly serve to put the Gospel through a Roman filter.
Here is where Anna starts telling half truths, falsely and habitually accusing others of what she is actively engaged in. For her lens is that of the Esau 'Jews', saturated in Judaism who's authority comes from Talmud and not the original Greek OT (Septuagint) or Greek NT.
Paul's name was Saul. It was changed to Paul after he met the resurrected Christ and was put on his specific mission to be the chief Apostle to the 10 northern tribes called Israel who're known today as whites/Europeans. Those Paul preached to were white Greeks/ white Romans/ white English,Irish, Scot, the whites in Gaul (France) and Iberia which means Hebrew (Spain). Paul who was a Judean only had obtained Roman citizenship so as to used this to his advantage much like how many today know they are State Nationals but still collect SS or Disability as a quasi "US Citizen".This was exemplified when Paul was in Prisoned because of the Esau 'Jews' got people riled up after he cast out an evil spirit from a women. He used his Roman Citizenship to shame those Romans who believed the 'Jews" and enslaved him and those with him because to enslave a free man was punishable by death.
36 And the keeper of the prison told this saying to Paul, The magistrates have sent to let you go: now therefore depart, and go in peace. 37 But Paul said unto them, They have beaten us openly uncondemned, being Romans, and have cast us into prison; and now do they thrust us out privily? nay verily; but let them come themselves and fetch us out.
Ch 16 - Acts of the Apostles - - The New Testament
Paul was not an Esau "Jew". All of whom opposed white Jesus are the Esau "Jews" and are to blame for murdering him as they sought to murder all of his Apostles, including Paul. Paul also opposed Paganism among his ethnic peoples preaching I AM/Jesus' word instead to regather his reachable ethnic relatives (mostly pagan tribes) that inhabited Europe and Greece because the dividing wall of separation between the north and south tribes of Israel had been brought down in this new contract/covenant (NT). Paul was not a white Roman. He was first and foremost a white man from the tribe of Benjamin of the southern Kingdom of Judaites, a Hebrew of Hebrews. He was among those Judaites attached to one of the two Houses of David, the one left in the land after the Assyrian deportation of all 12 tribes between 745 and 721 BC to Medes (modern Iran/Iraq).
Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.
Ch 3 - To the Philippians - - The New Testament
Jesus was of the tribe and lineage of King David, a Hebrew’s Hebrew. He grew up in a matriarchal world where a man’s estate and social standing come from his Mother, not his Father.
Untrue, half truths again. White Jesus was of the lineage of King David, thus of the house of David but he lived in a Patriarchal world. Under Hebrew law, a women could inherit things but ONLY if her father and mother had no sons. In such a case, the first born female could inherit etc, but then she would have to transfer those assets/blessings to her first born son. This was the case in regard to Mary. She had no brothers from her Mom and Dad (who was Heli) and Jesus was Mary's first born son. Thus through Heli, Mary's Dad, is Jesus's bloodline/inheritance traced in the book of Luke Chapter 3 saying Jesus was "Heli's son" laying out this patriarchal lineage from him though King David to Noah to Adam, son of God.
Ch 4 - The Holy Gospel according to Luke - The New Testament
Jesus' adopted father Joseph was under the same obligation as Mary since per adoption laws, he too would have to transfer his blessings, lands, assets etc to his first son (adopted or not). In Matthew, Jesus' blood/racial line is traced from Abraham to King David to his adopted Dad Joseph. This is fully detailed, please confirm for yourself in the original Greek/English.
Ch 1 - The Holy Gospel according to Matthew - The New Testament
Jesus is also the only begotten son of I AM (the God head of the trinity-Ecad which means a compound-oneness) and as such he also inherits the King and High Priest positions from Heaven as he will also on Earth soon to come to pass.
He spoke a language (Aramaic) which has one word (wo)man for both sexes. Women were freely allowed to follow Jesus and study with him and were a fundamental part of his entourage.
Jesus spoke Aramaic and Greek and probably other languages since we know that the spirit is communicated in all languages as proved by the Apostles in Acts Chapter 2.
Ch 2 - Acts of the Apostles - - The New Testament
Greek was the predominant language in Multi-cultural/Multi- ethnic Judea hellhole at this time much like English is the universal language used to speak internationally today as well as in all white/European nations that are being flooded. The NT letters/scriptures were written ONLY in Greek. The OT was translated into Greek two times. First just before the Judaites and one of the Houses of David were carried away to Babylon and then again, just before the Esau/Canaanite peoples of Edom/Idumea infiltrated into Judea around 125 BC becoming known as the "Jews" (which means, those who resemble Judaites in the Greek).
“Esau-Edom is modern Jewry.” 1925 Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 5 page 41. (Edomites are demon seed Canaanites from Idumea). NOT of Israel or Judah. Jews were NEVER SLAVES in Egypt with Moses: John 8:33, so “Jews” cannot BE the Israelites of the bible, despite what you THINK your bible says! “Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a “Jew” or to call a contemporary Jew an Israelite or Hebrew.” Jewish Almanac 1980, p. 3. (Jews know they are frauds).“Edomite Jews began to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860.” Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol. 10:23. The [non-Israelite] Edomites became a section of the Jewish people. (Jerusalem, Israel: Encyclopaedia Judaica Company, 1971) Vol. 6, p. 378. They [the non-Israelite Edomites] were then incorporated with the Jewish nation. "EDOM, IDUMEA," The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York & London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1904) Vol. V, p. 41. From then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants. "EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589. They [the Edomites] were hereafter no other than [non-Israelite] Jews. Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews (Grand Rapids, MI: Dregel Publications, 1960) Book XIII, Chapter IX, Verse1, p. 279
Yes, women did indeed follow Jesus and this was/is a very good thing.
Who first heard him declare His identity and mission on Earth? A woman—- and a Samaritan woman, at that.
Jesus first declared his mission and his identity in front of his home crowd reading from scriptures detailed in Luke 4.
Ch 4 - The Holy Gospel according to Luke - The New Testament
This is before he took on his disciples and met the Samaritan women. He read aloud stating boldly"‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to preach the gospel to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed; to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.’
Please, everyone,look it up and verify yourself.
Who knew and accepted the terrifying misery of His Passion and anointed Him for it? A woman.
Yes, Mary Magdalene did and bless her.
Who stood at the cross and suffered with him while most other disciples ran away?
At this time, much like it was/is in America, women were given special privilege as the weaker sex. The disciples that were known to the Esau Jews were being hunted by the Romans at the behest of these "Jews".This is because men held sway, dominion in religion and politics. Jesus's women followers nor his Mother were in any danger yet John was at the cross as well, and had they known who Jesus was referring to when he spoken in generic terms to him, he would have been in immediate danger of being executed. That's just a plain fact. I mean sheesh, Jesus from the cross even pointed out his Mom saying "Women, behold, your son" and then saying cryptically "disciple (John) behold your mother "(telling John to care for his mother in his absence) in John 19:26.
Ch 19 - The Holy Gospel according to John - The New Testament
Who were the first to hear and bring tidings of His Resurrection? The women, again.
Yes, the men, the disciples were in hiding, still being hunted down so the women were sent by the men to go check on his tomb. If this wasn't the case and the women were under a threat of arrest or murder, why would they go to check on the tomb knowing that it was being guarded by a platoon of Roman Soldiers on the lookout for his disciples who might try and steal his body like the Esau "Jews" claimed to Pilate they would? You twist the scriptures to suggest that the women were all brave and the men were all wussies. You invert the truth as is typical of Jewish Feminist rhetoric.
And never, ever, did Jesus say or do anything to condemn women or hold them in any disrespect or suggest that they were subservient.
Among Jesus ethnic peoples, women in Jesus time were held within a patriarchal order in positions of high regard and special consideration as the weaker sex to be honored. Much like women in our old Christian Patriarchal order were treated. Condemned? no. Oppressed? no. disrespected? if honorable, no. Subservient, yes.
If anything, He proclaimed that the servants among us are the masters— a fact which all those eager to oppress women should finally hear.
No, not necessarily and that's not what Jesus said. To be a servant is to be the greatest among us but that doesn't give one automatic authority inside the scriptural hierarchy. Why? Because to be a servant is to lead by example, taking on more hardships/suffering for others than others and anyone can do this from their ordained roles (slave/servant, master, father, mother, children).But this doesn't place women above men anymore than it places children above their parents or slaves above their masters. We are to regard our children as our highest priority, the most innocent among us. And likewise to children, women were always kept out of the pollutions of the world (politics, Government, dirty work, war etc) to try and maintain as much as possible their innocents too. If you think that somehow children are to rule over their parents and women are to rule over men, and that we as parents, or we as men, are to take orders from either women or children as our masters, then you're more messed up than I thought.
Here is the hierarchy we are to follow of those who belong to the race, the people of Jesus Christ
Ch 5 - To the Ephesians - - The New Testament
Here is the hierarchy pertaining Children, Parents, Slaves and Masters
Ch 6 - To the Ephesians - - The New Testament
Here is my challenge to Tyron Parsons and all those of his ilk: show me one instance where Jesus ever taught anyone that women are subservient to men?
Just because the Earth travels around the Sun and Jesus in the flesh never proclaimed it overtly in the Gospels doesn't mean it's 'not so. If you believe that Jesus is I AM in the Garden then you would believe Genesis 3:16 -- ...Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you. If you believe the Apostles ORDAINED by I AM/Jesus to head up the 12 tribes of Israel you'd believe Jesus, I AM/the Spirit was speaking through those Apostles in 1 Corinthians 11:3 -- ...the head of the woman is man... in 1 Corinth. 14:34 -- ...women... must be in submission... and in Ephesians 5:22 -- Wives, submit to your husbands. Simple as that.
To not accept this is to say Jesus was wrong in appointing his Apostles and that I AM/Jesus was wrong when he ordained the roles of both man and women after their fall in the Garden. In other words, if you don't accept this, then you don't accept the actual OT or trumping NT law that is the overall trumping law of all law, especially our Anglo-Saxon, Common, Natural, Christian law which is the highest law of our land and our people.
Or that white men are superior to black?
I already stated repeatedly to you that all races have areas of superiority and inferiority, one to the other, depending on the subject matter. This truth is the same for men and women as it is for individuals. This is NO excuse to support "diversity" or multi cultural-ethnic societies/Governments, condemning as you do ethnic homogenous societies, but ONLY among white peoples/nations. Shoot, the so called 'Jews" "Israeli" state is an ethnic homogenous society/Government and you sure as heck don't condemn them and nor do you the Chinese, Japanese, African homogenous nations or anyone else! This fact above is also absolutely no justification for your support of the genocide of whites/European- Americans, the invasion of our lands led by these 'Jews" as you habitually try to bequeath what is our race's inheritance in America alone to other races who happen to inhabit America. Nor does it justify your backing of the usurpation of man's role in the household, the marriage or in Government/ the public realm here or anywhere else.
This is who YOU SUPPORT! “And so it came to pass that prophesies came true, the despicable Goyim are at our feet and we rule the globe. For our Master who had lost the fight for heaven was determined to have rulership over the material world, and we his people; the fallen angels of Lucifer, who took birth alongside the despised humans, have come to conquer them in the end.”
Jesus's parable about the talents isn't really about money but money is being used to denote talent or ability. Neither is this parable only speaking of individual inequality, how more ability means more responsibility, But rather, Jesus is laying out the principal of inequality and the rewards and punishments exacted equally attached to exorcise of this principal. And as such this parable's equality principal can also be applied to group, gender, race inequality as well.
Ch 25 - The Holy Gospel according to Matthew - The New Testament
Or that members of the Ten Lost Tribes— Israelites—- are superior to the Tribe of Judah — the Jews?
I never said the northern tribes were superior to the southern tribes or visa versa but I do admit that each authentic tribe of Israel including their groupings as north and south has a character and abilities specifically different than the other(s). Levi and Judah of the authentic Judaite tribes of the south did have ruling authority over the other tribes of Israel until Jesus came (Genesis 49:10) just as the northern tribes of Ephraim and Manassah (Genesis 48:19) have had ruling authority over the same toward the end of this particular earth age.
Furthermore, concerning other races like blacks or Asiatics, obviously both Jacob's people (whites/Europeans) and the people of Esau (The "Jews") have special blessings encoded in their DNA/Bloodline/Spirit.
I SAY the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, 2 That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. 3 For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
Ch 9 - To the Romans - The New Testament
Concerning those you call the 'Jews", the people of Esau, they do have the "right" to usurp us white/European authentic Israelites of Jacob at the very end of this age (each age) as proclaimed by Isaac in his blessings of Jacob and Esau (Genesis 26,27,28). Their switching ruling authority at the end of each age and beginning of the next is detailed in depth in the book of Jasher.
The Book of Jasher
Jesus didn’t teach any of that. That is the truth.
You don't understand or don't care what Jesus taught in this regard, and that's the truth.
Paul, a Roman who grew up under Roman patriarchy, is the source of the women are subservient malarkey—-a Roman filter overlying the Hebrew truth.
Absolute nonsense. Women have been under men's dominion since the beginning but like Eve, they have tried to usurp God's ordained role through modern women's suffrage and of course, always led by the "Jews".
Paul grew up inside of Esau "Jews" Judaism but left that to adopt Hebrew Common law (which had been usurped) within the New Contract much like how our Anglo Saxon common law has been usurped by the 'Jews" Babylonian legal fiction codes. I already established this above.
Generations of men have grown up confused, unable to tell the difference between the actual Gospel taught by Jesus and interpretations of the Gospel taught by Paul and other Disciples.
The only confusion in men about the gospel comes from Judaizers and feminist like you.
In the same way, people mistake Articles of the Constitution as being the same as Amendments to the Constitution. They are not. The Articles are the actual stuff and substance and body of the Constitution. Amendments are just codicils of the Will established by the People (that is, Militia), adopted by some members of later generations. Amendments are in no way equivalent to the Articles, but everyone misses that fact, too.
Sorry, I don't see your analogy. The NT law and Natural law are in accord as is our common law (how we practice the former) if we do it correctly which is mandated to be a Patriarchy. The Constitution is a contract to a Governing body of free peoples who're supposed to be our servants doing the will of we the people (made up of white male landowners over the age of 21) within a Republic. If this contract is broken (which it has been irreparably), we white males have the right to amend or abolish the Constitution and form a new Government that is to our satisfaction. And ONLY us white males are authorized to do this because we are the ONLY PARTY cited in our enacting clause (Declaration) or the treaties thereafter.
This is why I am for either re-seating our old Government within our Anglo-Saxon Common/Natural/Christian law or forming an entirely new form of Government under our same law. If we go that route, I prefer a highly homogenous white/European country, nation, inside of a Monarchy-Republic type of Government combining both centralized, decenralized and bottom up/ top down authority structures.
For a Christian, the actual Gospel—the words, deeds, and teachings of Jesus— are the only dictum that matter, the only true authority that exists. All the rest is interpretations and add-ons, filtered through the prejudices and experiences of other men.
The believer recognizes our law and it's authority. The non believer doesn't, but I AM/Jesus doesn't need the non believer's vote of approval to have the trumping authority he (or we) already have.
For an American born on the land of these United States, the actual Articles of the Constitution are what matter, not the Amendments. In the same way, the Amendments are just add-ons, filtered through the prejudices and experiences of later generations.
You can say that again, Like the 19th Amendment that was added to the fraud Corporation in total violation of the law of the land as well as the Declaration that has facilitated the downfall of America and our family structures like no other.
If we want the truth, we must go to the foundation and contemplate it for ourselves. We cannot rely on Paul or Pastor Phil or Tyron Parsons for our salvation. In the same way, we cannot rely on Amendments and interpretations by the “US Supreme Court” to guarantee our freedom.
I don't want people to rely on me because I don't claim to be infallible like the Pope claims who Anna cites her "authority" from as his left hand. Check out what I have written and verify it for yourself. For if you rely on the "last MAN standing" "Judge" Anna who claims she qualifies under our patriarchal Anglo Saxon Common etc, law's maxim, you're sure to follow the judaized/feminized blind women into the ditch.
When we know and act upon the Truth, the world comes back into focus. Sharpen up your Shinola Sensors, Campers! Scrape away the filters and look at what the actual Gospel and actual Constitution say—-and stop being misled and confused.
In other words, stop listening to Anna (or me for that matter), verify and study these issues on your own and while you're at it, SHOW ME WHERE I AM WRONG.
This content was originally submitted and published at Operation Disclosure.