Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.


The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"

- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top

Send your entry and speak out today!

News Alerts

RV/INTELLIGENCE ALERT - February 19, 2018


Alliance Ghost Operatives uncovered blueprints for prototype weapons from the Cabal-MIC D.U.M.B. located near Sawtooth Range before destroying it.


Attached to the blueprints were documents revealing plans for a particular prototype weapon being constructed at a hidden underground outpost located under Gannett Peak, Wyoming.


This particular prototype weapon is a long range, low frequency repeater which amplifies and re-routes standard HAARP signals.


This was a major concern for the Alliance due to the fact Gannett Peak is close to Yellowstone Caldera.


The Alliance have located this outpost and deployed Ghost Operative Teams to neutralize and destroy it as of 12:39 PM EST today.


The D.U.M.B. at Sawtooth Range was the last "recorded" Cabal-MIC D.U.M.B. that was built.


Cabal-MIC hidden underground outposts may still remain.


Note: These hidden underground outposts are not classified as D.U.M.B's.


All threats must be neutralized prior to bringing in the new financial system (RV/GCR) and beginning the transition event into Nova Earth.


The Alliance are racing against time as the window of opportunity to begin the transition event this month is closing fast.


---


FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THE RV/GCR VISIT:


http://www.dinarchronicles.com/intel.html


---

Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR as of Feb. 20, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR Update as of Feb. 20 2018 Compiled 12:19 am EDT 20 Feb. 2018 by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret, CEO, Child Abus...

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Tech Giants Are Uniting to Develop A Set of Ethics for AI

IN BRIEF

Insiders have revealed to the New York Times that the biggest players in AI are meeting to discuss pressing issues on the development of AI. The goal is to organize in hopes of self-policing before governmental regulatory bodies have to be deployed.

AI ETHICS?


Contrary to fictional portrayals of humans being herded like animals by Artificially Intelligent (AI) machines, realistic concerns about artificial intelligence are far more benign. Still, they are very important, and conversations have to begin in order to look at perhaps setting some ground rules.



Image source: Getty Images

That's why the big players are stepping up. Researchers and scientists from large tech companies Google, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, and Facebook have been meeting and discussing the future implications of AI for humans.

While no hard details on the group's policies, objectives, or even it's name have come out, insiders have stated the group's intentions: to ensure that A.I. research is focus
ed on benefiting people, not hurting them. That's according to the New York Times.

SELF-POLICING

While no evil Skynet-esque boogeymen have revealed themselves, the increasing pace of AI technology has far outrun regulation or even ethics discussions on the topic. IBM's Watson has already demonstrated its ability to make movie trailers and beat humans at their own game. AI is the brains behind all self-driving tech. Militaries all over the world are increasingly being automatized.

A report published by Stanford impresses the need for industry efforts such as this team-up, in order to solve potential AI problems in the future. The aim of the Stanford group is to check in and report on the status of AI every 5 years for the next century. These meetings and discussions could form the framework for self-policing cooperation.

Such organization could be key to working out the problems of AI, since each company is potentially tugging at a different string when it comes to the technology. Bringing in government regulators now would be ineffective at best, and could stifle innovation at its worst.

"We're not saying that there should be no regulation," said Peter Stone, one of the authors of the Stanford report, to the New York Times. "We're saying that there is a right way and a wrong way."

— Source: http://futurism.com/tech-giants-team-up-to-tackle-issues-on-ai/

Receive News from Operation Disclosure via Email

Shoutbox Disclaimer

Please be advised that the Shoutbox is NOT moderated. Use it at your own will.