Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"

- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top

Send your entry and speak out today!

Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR as of Dec. 13, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 13, 2018 Compiled 13 Dec. 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Abuse R...

Thursday, December 13, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR as of Dec. 13, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 13, 2018

Compiled 13 Dec. 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Abuse Recovery, Author, “Twenty Two Faces.” Articles on a CIA/Vatican Ninth Circle Child Sacrifice Cult:

Source: Dinar Chronicles

Below is a summary of information from the Internet. It would be up to the individual reader to do their own research and decide whether or not it was valid. Patience is a Virtue. Having Virtue is a sign of a good moral being. Good moral beings have the power to overcome evil and change the world. 

I would like to extend a special Thank You to Martha for her untiring research efforts in discerning the Truth. 

Judy Note on The Plan: Where we think we are as of early morning Mon. Dec. 13:


*Right now the new US Treasury Notes were gold/asset-backed, available to trade and live on bank screens.

* For over two weeks China and Iraq have been exchanging, while private bank exchanges in the US have been going on since Mon. Dec. 3.

*All paymasters were paid, have paid their groups or were ready to pay them. The 127 Humanitarian projects were paid last Wed-Sat. Tiers 1, 2, 3 have been paid. Tier 4 Group A were either paid, or lining up to be paid.

* On Dec. 10 everything initiated in Hong Kong. Tony said his Iraq intel sources indicated that there was a 100% chance that the RV/GCR would happen this week, with dates of Dec. 12 to 15. Bruce said that Tier 4 Group B (us) would be paid by the end of this week, meaning by Sat. Dec. 15.

*Right now Redemption Center staff were on 24 hour call. Redemption Centers as a whole were not going to be available 24 hours around the clock. Some would, some would not, while others would exchange at night, or late into the night.

*At your exchange/redemption bring your currencies, two IDS, two copies of utility bills or something that shows you were a real person with an address. If you were doing a project, have a short typed up summary about it. Bullet points were fine. Be ready to present your project in a couple of sentences.

*The Zim was a bond and proceeds on it must be used for humanitarian needs. It has been suggested that you have a figure in mind of how much you need to do your project and they would adjust your Zim rate accordingly.

*Zimbabwe has projects approved for humanitarian needs. The Exchange/Redemption staff could educate you on how you could use your Zim monies for the humanitarian programs in Zimbabwe. You could receive 7-10% tax free interest on monies invested in Zimbabwe humanitarian projects. Interest received would be dependent on how much you invest and the length of your investment. All Zim would be paid out in structured payouts.

*This week we expect a Declassification Event announcement that would trigger the unsealing of over 63,233 indictments, causing the Stock Market to crash and forcing the Global Currency Reset.

*It was believed that Tier 4 Group B (us, the Internet Group) would begin exchanges/ redemptions around the time of that Declassification Event and Stock Market crash.

*We have between the 800#s release time and Sat. Dec. 22 to do our Zim redemptions and currency exchanges at Redemption Centers, where you could ask to see the back screen higher rates and negotiate for higher rates. After Dec. 22 the centers would close.

*After Dec. 22 you could still exchange currencies at a bank, though not redeem Zim. Banks normally exchanged currencies at the rate shown on the front screen.

*During the RV/GCR there would be a transition period of around two weeks where unsealing of the indictments would instigate mass arrests.

* On Dec. 21 Congress was scheduled to recess, (the same day of the Congressional Budget vote). Government officials were to come back on Jan. 3. Does anyone think that would happen with the soon-to-begin RV/GCR and mass arrests on 63,233 indictments said to name ¾ of members of Congress? Q said that the FISA declassification would “bring down the House” and the latest Intel Report on Dec. 11 stated: “All U.S. government officials listed in the sealed indictments have been given notice of imminent criminal prosecution and a lifetime at GITMO.”

*By year’s end Central Banks would be reorganized, plus the Federal Reserve and IRS, eliminated.

*Sometime this Dec. we could expect announcement of the US Restored Republic, GESARA Law and a new Flat Tax System - said to be 17% on newly bought items only, with no tax on medicine and food.

*Military Tribunals for Elites sent to GITMO would begin Jan 2.

*The public could get started with their exchanges the middle of the first week in Jan. 2019.

*New US elections were expected to be completed sometime in April-May 2019.

Trump’s Tweets:

Q Posts:

B. Dec. 12 2018 TNT Call Ray, Tony: 

Sources were still saying the RV/GCR would go this week, or by Sat. Dec. 15. One bank source said we would be in the banks by Fri. Dec. 14.

C. Dec. 12 2018 Corrupted Republican Party Would Collapse in 6 Months Due to Pedophilia (video), Steele: Robert David Steele Update December 12 2018 - Former CIA Agent David Steele feels that the corrupted Republican Party would collapse in the next six months due to Pedophilia.

D. Dec. 11 2018 11:47 pm EST Economic Structure Change (video), X22 Report: (Video) X22 Report -- Episode 1738: Economic Structure Change | Military Tribunals

Europe insisted that the BREXIT deal would not be renegotiated. It was either the people take the EU deal, or else. Australia was warning of a housing crisis. World's largest cleaning service ISS was laying off 100,000 employees. The number of employees has been declining for years. Trump reported very productive talks with China, big new coming soon. The Central Bank was trying to control the narrative, you could see via the MSM. The entire economic structure was about to change, prepared and ready for the transition. Broward Commissioner on Elections would do an audit. Nadler pushed the campaign violation. It was not a violation. Obama was fined for a violation in 2013. Trump's occurred before he was running. Trump tweeted out that Comey knew the Dossier was paid for by the D's. Jim Jordan grilled Google. Yellow vests rejected Macrons concessions. Q dropped more bread. The Wall would be built using military funding. The raid on the CF whistleblower was needed and the name was leaked to unseal docs. Could civilians be on Military Tribunals? History said yes. The DS was panicking. They could not impeach the President because the Senate would try the impeachment. The target was the Senate.

E. Dec. 11 2018 Gundlach said that stocks were breaking down, bonds were overvalued and the Fed was on a Suicide Mission:

F. Dec. 12 2018 Cardinal Pell Found Guilty on All Counts of Sex Abuse:

G. Dec. 12 2018 8:39 pm EST New Financial Structure per Q, Sylvie Girl: "New Financial Structure per Q" by Sylvie Girl - 12.12.18

The intro vid is narrated by a Special Forces member summarizing Gould's story. A group of these folks took it upon themselves to research:

White Hats in Trump Administration:


The first SCRIBD doc:

Links to documents:

1. The work has been done to rid of us Admiralty Law (law of the sea or commerce law) and return us to common law (law of the land). Chairman General Joseph Dunford, Secretary of Defense General Mattis and President Donald Trump were aware of this.

2. The videos explain how it was done in detail, most of which has been hidden from us. The RENO vids were done this past summer, which will bring more surprises.

3. The videos are Gould describing in detail how it was done, including a vid with Miller describing the development of the quantum language contractual correct grammar basics, and how it is used. It was used to disprove the financial fraudulent contracts with the Cabal (deepstate/shadowgovt), which is what they were using to enslave us over the past hundred plus years. He also shares his involvement with Special Forces in conducting public courts-martial of hundreds of military members in the early 2000s.

4. In Gould's Reno vids, done within 45 days after Miller's death this past June 2018, he releases highly "classified" info about his work (in the mid-2000s) with undercover FBI agents and a group of Federal Postal Judges to get the the "copyright usage" of the quantum language's correct-grammar-parse-syntax transferred from Miller to Gould's control. You see...although Miller and Gould were friends (and business partners), he was found to be teaching and sharing the quantum language with top-level Cabal, specifically the Clintons and the Rothschilds, which would have locked us under complete slavery to them forever.

5. Gould has it within his power (officially recognized by Universal Postal Union in Switzerland, all Federal Postal Offices, Vatican, United Nations, high-level financial entities, US Navy and other White Hat entities within Trump's Administration) to end the financial fraud forever. Follow his comments carefully...especially when he talks about his discussions with cardinals, high-level finance people at the Fed, and others. These evil people knew Gould was correct in his position and acknowledged it, yet We The People were never told.

6. The videos explain involvement of Special Forces, undercover FBI, several SCRIBD documents, multiple millions of tons of gold that Gould has control over, and even a new "Peoples" bank waiting in the wings.

H. Dec. 12 2018 Latest Q, Slather: (Video) Destroying the Illusion -- [12.12] Latest Q | Google | Yellow Vests | Israeli Trafficking Busted | Delonge's "To The Stars"

France to Probe Possible Russian Influence on Yellow Vest Protests:

What the President Could Do If He Declares a State of Emergency:

44 ex-senators warn U.S. is 'entering a dangerous period:

12 Israelis Suspected Of Child Sex Trafficking As Colombia Busts Up Ring:

I. Dec. 12 2018 9:11 pm EST We Have the Gold, Q, Sierra: "Q: Gold will Destroy the FED" by Sierra (NZ) - 12.12.18

Updates for the week prior:

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 12, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 11, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 10, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 9, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 8, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 7, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Dec. 6, 2018

Gingerbread Santa Picture in Trump Towers Elevator

Source: Dinar Chronicles

You really have to look at this closely in order to get the import. Yes, it is signed below by QA or Qanon. However, no one mentioned that the handle of the hammer in the right hand cuts across the white suit sleeve creating another "Q" image that is holding the hammer.

Some might say that is all conjecture. But look at the face of Santa closely. Zoom in and you will see it is the face of President Trump behind the white beard and Santa hat.

But even more ominous is the bag of toys he has over his shoulder. It is done in camo. Not just regular camo but GILLY suit camo, the kind worn by sniper assassin's.

The picture also has some holly leaves on the left side of Santa's hat brim that means something. It may represent some kind of military combat symbol.

The Q motif apparently represents Q Clearance which is above Top Secret Clearance.

Put all that altogether in the elevator of Trump Towers, and the picture is unmistakable.

Benjamin Fulford Report: "Secret War Centers on SWIFT" -- December 10, 2018

Weekly Geo-political News and Analysis

Secret war centers on SWIFT after George Bush Sr. is executed

By Benjamin Fulford, White Dragon Society

Since the death of Nazi Fourth Reich Fuhrer George Bush Sr., the battle for control of the world’s financial system, and thus of the process of deciding humanity’s future, is now centering on control of the SWIFT international interbank electronic transfer system.

A final battle is taking place between the 13 bloodlines which have traditionally controlled the planet, and the meritocratic Gnostic Illuminati who control the U.S. military-industrial complex, multiple sources agree. The battle is heading for a climax of sorts now that George Bush Senior has been “executed,” as confirmed by both Pentagon and CIA sources.

Here is what a CIA source had to say:

“I have been told by two sources that G.H.W. Scherff (Bush) was actually indicted on September 10, 2018 for crimes against humanity, child trafficking, sedition, and treason. He allegedly plea-bargained a deal with the military tribunal hearing his case, to be executed/suicided to keep his legacy intact for his family and the sheeple. Trump signed the death order. So was it a clone that was executed, since we also have intel that he died in June (another clone). I think Bush/Scherff actually died in January 1992, choking on sushi and then finished off by Barbara Bush with a poisoned cloth (as seen in the video posted last week). Military tribunals are set to begin on January 2, 2019.”

Pentagon sources, for their part, said U.S. President Donald “Trump was careful not give Bush 41 a state funeral, as this executed criminal was denied a horse and caisson like Reagan got.”

“To the victor belong the spoils, for Trump picked former Bush Attorney General Bill Parr as his next AG and he chose ‘the day that will live in infamy,’ December 7th [the Pearl Harbor anniversary] to do it,” the Pentagon source added.

The CIA source also wondered if Barr made “a deal to avoid military tribunals and then be ‘McCained’? (the term being used lately for execution/suicide). Maybe he flipped like Senator Lindsey Graham?”

The death of Bush, the former U.S. Ambassador to China whose brother handed over U.S. military secrets to that country (as did Hillary and Bill Clinton), means that the U.S. and China are also heading to a showdown as bloodline families seek Chinese protection, according to secret society sources.

Pentagon sources say the arrest of Chinese conglomerate Huawei’s Chief Financial Officer Meng Wanzhou “is aimed to take down the Clintons and their treasonous ties to China back in the 1990s.” Chinese Freemasons previously admitted to this writer that they had invested heavily in getting Hillary Clinton elected as U.S. president because they had been promised a “United States of China,” including ASEAN, the Korean Peninsula, and Japan.

U.S. military intelligence also has confirmed to us previously that George Bush Sr. provided China with the technology needed to accurately guide their nuclear missiles. The purpose of the Clinton/Bush transfer of military technology to China was to make China more equal militarily with the G7 so that their planned “Gog versus Magog” end-times war would be sufficiently destructive to result in their planned artificial end times.

Instead, the religious fanatics behind this plan are going to face military tribunals “starting in January 2019,” Pentagon and CIA sources confirm.

To prepare for these tribunals, Pentagon sources say “Army Chief General Mark Milley was named as the next Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to provide continuity and protect Trump into his second term.”

“This announcement was made unusually early to send a message to the Deep State, as the previous JCS Chairman was Army, and Army was chosen again over Air Force and Navy,” the source continued. Air Force and Navy brass have been heavily implicated in the planned World War III, which is why they are missing their turn to run the entire JCS, Defense Intelligence Agency sources note.

To understand what sort of world changes the U.S. military government is hoping for, let us take a look at what U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a speech delivered at the German Marshall Fund on December 4, 2018.

In this speech, Pompeo said we need to “ask if the current international order serves the good of its people as well as it could. And if not, we must ask how we can right it.” Later in his speech he made it clear that current international institutions like the World Bank, the IMF, the EU, the UN, the African Union, and the Organization of American States were all failing and needed root and branch reform.

Here are some excerpts from his speech:

“The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund were chartered to help rebuild war-torn territories and promote private investment and growth. Today, these institutions often counsel countries who have mismanaged their economic affairs to impose austerity measures that inhibit growth and crowd out private sector actors…. Today at the United Nations, peacekeeping missions drag on for decades, no closer to peace…. The UN was founded as an organization that welcomed peace-loving nations. I ask: Today, does it continue to serve its mission faithfully? … Is the EU ensuring that the interests of countries and their citizens are placed before those of bureaucrats here in Brussels?”

However, Pompeo’s proposed solutions—to imitate what Trump was doing in the U.S. and to reassert the power of nation-states and of U.S. leadership—fell far short of the mark when it came to offering solutions to problems faced by the Western world and the planet as a whole.

He did not, for example, mention that the current financial system, controlled by a few interbred families, has devastated the middle class in the G7 and created huge gaps between the rich and the rest even in places like China. The situation is now such that 0.1% of the population controls more wealth than the bottom 90% of the population, and yet Pompeo did not propose a reset or jubilee to correct the situation.

Nor did Pompeo mention the fact that humanity has wiped out 60% of animal life since the 1970’s or offer any sort of solution.

In fact, Trump tweeted on December 8th that,

“The Paris Agreement isn’t working out so well for Paris. Protests and riots all over France. People do not want to pay large sums of money, much to third-world countries (that are questionably run), in order to maybe protect the environment.”

For sure, the Paris Agreement was based on fraudulent science that “carbon causes global warming.” We won’t go into detail here, but look at this link for an egregious example:

However, at least they were trying. The White Dragon Society proposes an alternative which is to set up a meritocratically staffed future planning agency to preside over a multi-trillion-dollar campaign to stop environmental destruction and end poverty. This could also provide jobs to the “useless eaters” slated for mass murder by the Nazi faction that Trump has taken over. We would like to see the U.S. military government propose something similar and get China, India, and the rest of the world on board, too.

In any case, the global warming faction looks like it is losing the battle for the West, especially in France, headquarters of the global-warming Rothschild faction. Here, Pentagon sources say, “Former French Chief of Defense Staff who was fired by French President Emmanuel Macron, Army General Pierre de Villiers, is the people’s choice for Élysée Palace.” They add that Marine “Le Pen is mightier than the sword, and if she fails to be president, would be a good Prime Minister or Foreign Minister.”

The U.S. military government’s fight against the bloodlines, though, is far from over. Getting back to Pompeo’s speech and the top of this article, we note he said:

“America intends to lead—now and always. For example, here in Belgium in 1973, banks from 15 countries formed SWIFT to develop common standards for cross-border payments, and it’s now an integral part of our global financial infrastructure. SWIFT recently disconnected sanctioned Iranian banks from its platform because of the unacceptable risk they pose to a system—to the system as a whole.”

What he was alluding to here is a European (bloodline) and Chinese effort to get around U.S. SWIFT sanctions by setting up an alternative international payments system. That is still happening, with countries like India, Russia, and China dumping SWIFT in order to end U.S. control of the international financial infrastructure.

The U.S. has been fighting back by forcing regime change in European countries that try to get out of SWIFT, hence (in part) the troubles in France.

The other big battleground is Japan. Here on December 6th, Softbank Corp. experienced a four-hour shutdown of its mobile and line-based telecommunications network. Softbank has been working with Huawei (the name 華為 by the way, means “for China”) to sell its phones and use its payments system. There is also the suspicion that Softbank is using the IPO of its telecoms unit, set for December 19th, as a disguised way of selling the unit to China, more specifically Huawei, CIA sources say.

Please bear in mind that Softbank bought Fortress Asset management, which owns Musashi K.K., the company whose machines count more than 80% of Japan’s votes. Richard Koshimizu of the Independent Party of Japan has provided detailed evidence showing the company, founded by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s grandfather, former Prime Minister Nobosuke Kishi, is used to steal Japanese elections.

It is also worth noting that the Abe government last week passed a law allowing Japan’s water resources to be privatized and presumably sold at a discount to Veolia, a company controlled by the French branch of the Rothschild family.

Also bear in mind that Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son has been offered at least $45 billion by Israeli (Rothschild) stooge Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Anyone want to bet on Son?

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

(Video) SerialBrain2 -- The Reason Trump Tweeted Smocking Gun

Published on Dec 12, 2018

Clinton Whistleblowers -- Thursday’s Public Hearing to Reveal “Explosive” Information

Clinton Whistleblowers: Thursday’s Public Hearing to Reveal “Explosive” Information

By Sara Carter
December 12, 2018 | 3:31 PM EST

A trove of documents on the Clinton Foundation alleging possible pay for play and tax evasion have been turned over to the FBI and IRS by several investigative whistleblowers, who will be testifying in an open hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Thursday, according to the committee and lawmakers.

Roughly 6,000 documents that are expected to reveal the nearly two year investigation by the whistleblowers with a private firm called MDA Analytics LLC, which allegedly turned over the documents more than a year and half ago to the IRS, according to John Solomon, who first published the report last week in The Hill.

The whistleblowers are former federal criminal investigators, who allege that the Clinton Foundation was “engaged in illegal activities and may be liable for millions of dollars in delinquent taxes and penalties,” according to Solomon.

The Department of Justice and the FBI’s Little Rock, Ark. field office, which is believed to be investigating the foundation, have allegedly obtained the documentation from the whistleblowers as well, according to lawmakers who’ve spoken with the whistleblowers.

Clinton Foundation officials could not be immediately reached for comment.

However, a former whistleblower, who has spoke with agents from the Little Rock FBI field office last year and worked for years as an undercover informant collecting information on Russia’s nuclear energy industry for the bureau, noted his enormous frustration with the DOJ and FBI. He describes as a two-tiered justice system that failed to actively investigate the information he provided years ago on the Clinton Foundation and Russia’s dangerous meddling with the U.S. nuclear industry and energy industry during the Obama administration.

William D. Campbell’s story was first published by this reporter in 2017. He turned over more than 5,000 documents and detailed daily briefs to the bureau when he served as a confidential informant reporting on Russia’s nuclear giant Rosatom. Campbell worked as an energy consultant, gaining the trust of Russians and providing significant insight into Russia’s strategic plans to gain global dominance in the uranium industry. He reported on Russian’s intentions to build a closer relationship with Obama administration officials, to include then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as reported. The documents he turned over to the DOJ, which were reviewed by this news site, showed Campbell had also provided highly sensitive information both related to the uranium case, as well as other intelligence matters, since 2006.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller was the director of the FBI at the time Campbell was a confidential informant and according to Campbell the information was briefed to Mueller by his FBI handlers.

“(Mueller) received the documents, copies of which I still have, over a period of years and ignored a national security threat to the United States because of his political preference,” said Campbell, who said he is frustrated that the investigation into the Clinton Foundation and the other information he provided was apparently ignored years ago.

“These men were in charge of transport of nuclear materials (inside the United States) while committing criminal activity here in the United States and signing major US utility contracts,” said Campbell, referring to the information he provided the FBI on the American company Transportation Logistics International, also known as TLI, was the primary transport company for Russian enriched uranium sold to the United States.

“One tea cup of what they were transporting both domestically and abroad could close down Wall Street or Washington,” Campbell warned. “(Mueller) ignored and delayed their arrests over years while I was risking my life undercover and interacting with these (Vladimir) Putin appointees both here in the United States and overseas.”

But Rep. Mark Meadows, chairman of the Freedom Caucus and member of the committee, said this time it will be different. He noted that the investigation is apparently ongoing with the FBI and DOJ and believes the information being delivered for Thursday’s hearing to be ‘explosive’ in nature and may help connect the dots.

Meadow’s told Fox New’s Martha MaCallum Tuesday, “the American people, they want to bring some closure, not just a few sound bites, here or there, so we’re going to be having a hearing this week, not only covering over some of those 6,000 pages that you’re talking about, but hearing directly from three whistleblowers that have actually spent the majority of the last two years investigating this.”

Meadows, who’s also on President Donald Trump’s short-list to replace Chief of Staff Gen. John Kelly, noted that some “allegations (whistleblowers) make are quite explosive.”

“We just look at the contributions. Now everybody’s focused on the contributions for the Clinton Foundation and what has happened just in the last year,” he said. “But if you look at it, it had a very strong rise, the minute she was selected as secretary of state. It dipped down when she was no longer there.”

“And then rose again, when she decided to run for president. So there’s all kinds of allegations of pay-to-play and that kind of thing,” Meadows added.

Jon Rappoport -- Exposed: the Nazi Roots of the European Union

Exposed: the Nazi roots of the European Union

by Jon Rappoport

This is an intelligence briefing. Here I present the bare bones of what has been happening before our eyes...if we would see it.

Once upon a time, there was an industrial combine in Nazi Germany called IG Farben. It was the largest chemical/pharmaceutical octopus in the world. It owned companies, and it had favorable business agreements with companies from England to Central America to Japan.

The author of The Devil's Chemists, Josiah DuBois, traveled to Guatemala, on a fact-finding mission, in the early days of World War 2, and returned with the comment that, as far as he could tell, Guatemala was "a wholly owned subsidiary of Farben."

The pharmaceutical empire was and is one of the major forces behind the European Union (EU). It is no accident that these drug corporations wield such power. They aren't only involved in controlling the medical cartel; they are political planners.

This is how and why Big Pharma fits so closely with what is loosely referred to as the New World Order. The aim of enrolling every human in a cradle-to-grave system of disease diagnosis and toxic drug treatment has a larger purpose: to debilitate, to weaken populations.

This is a political goal. It facilitates control.

IG Farben's main component companies, at the outbreak of World War 2, were Bayer, BASF, and Hoechst. They were chemical and drug companies. Farben put Hitler over the top in Germany as head of State, and the war was designed to lead to a united Europe that would be dominated by the Farben nexus.

The loss of the war didn't derail that plan. It was shifted into an economic blueprint, which became, eventually, the European Union.

The European Commission's first president was Walter Hallstein, the Nazi lawyer who, during the war, had been in charge of post-war legal planning for the new Europe.

As the Rath Foundation reports: In 1939, on the brink of the war, Hallstein had stated, "The creation of the New Law [of the Nazis] is ONLY the task of the law-makers!"

In 1957, with his reputation sanitized, Hallstein spoke the words in this manner: "The European Commission has full and unlimited power for all decisions related to the architecture of this European community."

Post-war, IG Farben was broken up into separate companies, but those companies (Bayer, Hoechst, and BASF) came roaring back, attaining new profit highs.

I refer you to the explosive book, The Nazi Roots of the Brussels EU, by Paul Anthony Taylor, Aleksandra Niedzwiecki, Dr. Matthias Rath, and August Kowalczyk. You can read it at relay-of-life [dot] com. It is a dagger in the heart of the EU.

At the Rath Foundation, you can also read Joseph Borkin's classic, "The Crime and Punishment of IG Farben."

In 1992, I was deeply engaged in researching the specific devastating effects of medical drugs. Eventually, I concluded that, at the highest levels of power, these drugs weren't destructive by accident. They were intended to cause harm. This was covert chemical warfare against the population of the planet. The Rockefeller-Standard Oil-Farben connection was a primary piece of the puzzle.

It was, of course, Rockefeller (and Carnegie) power that had forced the birth of pharmaceutical medicine in America, with the publication of the 1910 Flexner Report. The Report was used to excoriate and marginalize Chiropractic, Homeopathy, Naturopathy, and other forms of traditional natural practice, in favor of what would become the modern juggernaut of drug-based treatment.

In an article about the FDA, "Medical Murder in the Matrix," I point out the fact that this federal agency has permitted at least 100,000 deaths of Americans, per year, from the direct effects of drugs it, the FDA, has certified as safe. (See, for example, JAMA, July 26, 2000, 'Is US Health Really the Best in the World,' Dr. Barbara Starfield.)

The FDA knows these death figures. "Unintended" and "accidental" can no longer be applied to this ongoing holocaust.

The pharmaceutical industry itself also knows those death figures.

To understand the dimensions and history of the ongoing chemical warfare against the population, in the form of medical drugs (and of course pesticides), one must factor in the original octopus, IG Farben.

World War 2 never ended. It simply shifted its strategies.

In any fascist system, the bulk of the people working inside the system, including scientists, refuse to believe the evidence of what is happening before their own eyes. They insist they are doing good. They believe they are on the right side. They see greater top-down control as necessary and correct. They adduce "reasonable" explanations for inflicted harm and death.

World War 2 is still underway. The battleground has been changed, and the means are far cleverer.

Sun Tzu wrote: "Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting...The best victory is when the opponent surrenders of its own accord before there are any actual hostilities...It is best to win without fighting."

This is what has been happening: invisible warfare.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.

You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.

Reader: Deconstructing the Mainstream Mindset

Deconstructing the Mainstream Mindset

Submitted to Operation Disclosure | By James Hallahan

At the onset of the spiritual awakening, as one first begins to contemplate the nature of reality, there quickly comes out of obscurity a subtle yet formidable “opponent”. Marvelously, and without our knowing, this opponent has already erected itself a barrier over certain territories of thought which have apparently been deemed inappropriate for our deliberation. In a clever and underhanded way, it’s somehow been able to convince us, without proof, that these areas of thought have already been determined to be invalid. What’s more, is that it has given us the understanding that just their mere consideration is a sign of ignorance—or worse insanity. By far, the most astonishing thing is that no one ever actually questions its judgement. There’s the notion, rather shallow and ungrounded, that this barrier must surely have been put up in good faith—and that if there was something of substance behind it, then of course our eminent and wise intelligentsia would have discovered this long ago. Little are they aware, however, that the eminent and wise intelligentsia have virtually not set foot outside the barrier, and for the same fear that keeps everyone else in.

The formidable opponent is of course the conditioned “mainstream mindset”, and as the first step to true enlightenment—and the first step to freedom—it promptly needs to be overthrown and its barrier permanently deconstructed. The illogic of this barrier can be expressed simply: Have we really in fact, at this early stage, discovered all there is to know about reality? When attempting to find truth, is it really wise to restrict our search to confined parameters? Should we really presuppose in advance what is possible—without actually investigating? With respect to the spiritual journey, which is in large part a search for truth, this kind of mindset is not only obstructive but is in fact completely antithetical. For such an endeavor to be undertaken seriously, it is fundamental that we’re open to all possibility and that we let go of our preconceived notions in their entirety.

The necessity of an open-minded approach is exceptionally warranted by the fact that there has undoubtedly been manipulation—and on a very large scale. In its devastation, sorry to say, it has thoroughly corrupted science. Behind the scenes and all along, it has been suppressing inquiry into various fields of research which, we can presume, are somehow threatening to the existing paradigm. This fact, needless to say, changes the game entirely. Ascertaining truth about reality unfortunately becomes a more complicated task—one that actually requires starting over (from the ground up), on a completely clean slate, and totally independent from the conventional wisdom. On the surface, this of course appears extreme; however, upon seriously taking stock of the manipulation, one discovers quickly a remarkably high level of sophistication, quite over and above what we would anticipate. The capacity, it can honestly be stated, is that of virtual omnipotence—and, with its blessing, there unfortunately has been very little restraint. It may well be argued that science as we know it, to a very far degree, is essentially a “device”—a clever contrivance used to manufacture a counterfeit worldview with the aim of concealing the true nature of reality.

But, as is widely known, the mainstream mind will not give countenance to such possibilities—not through any persuasion. It has concluded, prematurely, that this is just too unrealistic. The basis for this—please take note—is that, because this has not yet been announced on the television, everything must therefore be in good order. Frightfully, this is the level of wariness of the human species. If you wish to lead them astray, simply present to them a man who’s well-groomed and appears to have some comprehension of what he’s talking about. Rest assured, the majority of them will acquiesce and conform to his bidding. For the more rebellious ones who are still unswayed, all that need be done is to convey the deceit within the context of a Hollywood movie. Be sure to add in numerous people firing off weapons and, have no doubt, this will string along even the most recalcitrant. This may appear a slightly immoderate assessment, however, upon taking survey of what’s hidden beneath the water-line, I think we can safely say that this is accurate.

Returning to the idea of wholesale corruption in science, the unacquainted reader will most likely conclude that I mean duplicitous scientists, employed by a secret cabal, who, with willful intent, are misleading the public. This, for the most part, is not the case. The methodology it turns out is quite different, and the scientists, by and large, are unwitting. From my own perception, it can be likened to the cultivation of a garden—whereupon the (undamaging to the system) “good” ideas, are the ones that receive nurturing, and the (nonconformist) “bad” ideas are the ones that get stamped out and treated as weeds. The means by which this is accomplished is simply by controlling the consignment of funds. The architects of the manipulation, having prominent influence over these funds, in turn control where they go. And so, with relative ease, the whole of science can be molded & directed and its parameters kept easily in check.

This “behind the scenes” management of science—implementing a suppression of alternative ideas—resulted in the philosophy of “materialism”: The theory that matter is the only reality and that everything can be explained through material agencies. On evaluation of this, bearing in mind the manipulation, it can be postulated that orthodox materialism is in fact a comprehensive form of subterfuge—which, with great efficacy, keeps the whole of science at bay and prevents our ascertainment of the true reality. The reason it works is simple: If the metaphysical is excluded as even being a possibility and is presumed to not exist, then, quite predictably, no one is ever going to conduct research on it. It will be categorically dismissed and, due to the astonishingly unscientific culture, it will also be shunned and therefore avoided for fear of defamation. This is precisely what has occurred and, accordingly, the scope of scientific thought has become largely homogeneous and based solely upon observable, physical processes. Noteworthy here is the fact that this preconception of reality is essentially implanted into the scientist from the get-go. They are in fact bred to be materialists—and, safe to say, the validity of it is never really questioned. Amazingly, it’s almost as if it’s regarded to be a kind of law of physics, which it should be kept in mind that it is not. It is absolutely still a theory.

Despite its abhorrence to the orthodox scientist, I will nevertheless draw our attention and scrutiny to the revered “scientific method”. I am in no way proposing that it is ineffectual, but only that it perhaps contains one sizable flaw: By reason of its own principles, it does not technically have the capacity to ascertain phenomena of a non-physical nature. So if it just so happens that we do in fact live in a much more complex universe—one which contains non-physical aspects—then scientists, needless to say, will continue to go along merrily unaware of it and will likely be the last ones to know. They will no doubt persist in their conviction that if it can’t be observed, measured or empirically tested, then it therefore must not exist. Is it not self-evident the problem with this inflexibility? Yes, it can be seen why this appears unproblematic to them—but that’s because they presume that they’re right. The trouble arises of course when it’s found that they’re wrong and this rigidity turns out to be a tremendous fault which has led them far down the road into error. Given the fact that science is still practically in its infancy, the possibility of this does not at all seem improbable. Moreover, I think it can be argued that such overturns are bound to happen. We have seen sizable ones in the past, such as for instance with plate tectonics, which was at the time thought to be a lunatic fringe idea. Of foremost indication of this is what has been revealed in quantum physics. It’s clear now that matter on the subatomic level has some very bizarre and unexpected properties which just cannot be fully explained by current models of physics. Additionally it has been shown that, when carrying out experiments, the observer itself actually has an influence to some degree on their outcome. What this is proving, at long last, is that consciousness is indeed transcendent beyond the brain and also that it does seem to have some kind of interplay with the external environment. Reasoning from this alone, I would say it isn’t going to be long before it’s brought to light that materialism has all along been fundamentally flawed.

The trouble though, however, is that materialism has been at large for quite some time now and is essentially the foundational philosophy which overarches every field. To illustrate this allegorically: The whole tree of science basically—root and branch—has spawned from a bad seed and by deliberation has grown crooked and in the direction opposite to truth. In light of this, there will perhaps need to be a significant pruning down the road. Many things that have been overlooked will need to be taken account of and, furthermore, much that has since been established will of course need to be reassessed. The most problematic issue though, by far, is that materialism has by no means remained confined to just the scientists. By virtue of our specious education system, it has instead been distributed in widespread fashion and is now situated inexorably within the minds of virtually everyone. In effect, it has formed the foundation of our sense of rationality—the central component of the mainstream mindset—and in so doing has narrowed our perception of what is possible to a very limited spectrum. As I will argue, this a considerable problem as it has essentially blinded us to the most critical and determinative aspects of reality. Further than that, it is of course the principal means by which the manipulation is able to be kept secret. Very advantageously it operates outside the range of our awareness. If we’re wholly unbelieving of the metaphysical, we’re wide open to a vast array of designs and none of it can be made known to the public as it will of course be mechanically dismissed and regarded without thought as an impossibility.

In illustration of this, I will diverge momentarily and direct attention to what is probably the most fundamental mechanism used in the object of control and repression. To orthodoxy this will, on the surface, appear to be rather outlandish; however, rest assured that to the above manipulator this is something of paramount importance and is utilized extensively on a grand scale. It involves what is known as “vibrational attraction”—a quite remarkable aspect of reality which has extraordinary implications. It is based on the understanding that reality is not really so much an external locale, but rather an internal experience which is being generated by our own consciousness. So, contrary to appearances, it is not at all the solid physical environment we see it as. It is actually energy which we only perceive to be physical, and underlying it there are forces at play which govern the nature of its experience. Rather mysteriously, it is directly correlated with our perception and the beliefs that we uphold. That is to say, what we take on in our mind, in turn projects itself onto our reality. If we have doubts, they become deficiencies. If we feel we are powerless, we thereby render ourselves as such. And so, little did we realize, it is our own consciousness that has been running the show and creating our experience.

As ill fortune would have it though, malignant and influential forces—who I regret to say are at the helm of civilization—have long known about this. They know as well that the human soul is essentially boundless and at full potential cannot possibly be ruled over or held by any form of control. It is therefore understood that to achieve and maintain supremacy, the spiritual force must somehow be subverted and its capacity rendered to a lower level of functioning. The manner in which this is done is through utilizing the above-mentioned knowledge. In essence, it is hijacking the soul’s own creativity capacity by instilling within the mind conceptions which are conceding to inability (self-limiting beliefs). In our particular situation this has been carried out through far-ranging infiltration of societal institutions, most predominantly religion, and in more recent times science. In terms of religious doctrine, I would say that the perniciousness is largely attributable to the partitionment of mankind from the divine—which I suspect was the fulcrum of the entire manipulative design. If you separate man from God and recast their relationship as a kind of partitioned hierarchy—where man is required to look outside of himself to the help of a deity—then naturally this will engender a disposition of impotency. With science, it’s more straightforward. If you relegate man to nothing more than biology, then of course you will have reduced spiritual capacity full measure. And so, when the world at large becomes saturated with the view of humans as being naturally fallible—cleverly framed as the notion “being only human”—then what ultimately develops is a kind of transmutation of the species into something far diminished from what it was formerly. With that said though, I do not mean to imply that this was the sole machination that has brought us to where we are now, but rather just one of many.

Taking this fully into account, it becomes plainly visible the tremendous folly of scientific dogmatism—and its resultant mainstream conception of reality. The barrier they’re so keen to maintain hasn’t just impeded our pursuit of truth—it has, without question, been far more consequential. Little do they know, they are preserving the conditions permitting of our foremost vulnerability. And due to this, we’ve gotten ourselves into a rather large-scale predicament—containing, perhaps, an oversupply of adversity. This isn’t to be cynical, but only to point out just what a bad idea it can be to fall into narrow-mindedness. What you’re omitting from your framework could turn out to be critical. Among other things, the seeming “quiescence” of the universe could turn out to be misleading. Perhaps, not having a very complete understanding of this place, that we should have been giving thought to recondite contingencies. Perhaps this would be just standard procedure of an intelligent species—to exercise a latitude of thought, so as to identify unrecognized dangers. In this vein, it would only be consistent that we carefully appraise this barrier—and consider deeply how it could, at the end of the day, turn out to be a blindfold.

At the same time though—moving away from science—it really isn’t at all surprising that the “beyond the barrier” territory is so widely deserted. The difficulty is that the separation between it and the norm is quite substantial. In truth, it is an immense chasm which, from the narrow mainstream perspective, makes the esoteric seem incredibly anomalous and without real basis. With careful inspection of this circumstance, however, it can be deduced that this is designful. Apart from the delusive conceptions propagated by science, what else has been taking place is a systematic and widespread marginalization of spiritual and esoteric philosophy. In substance, it is a calculated process whereby spiritual and esoteric ideas are deliberately misrepresented in order to dissuade belief and slant opinion in the unfavorable direction. Film and television are of course the most efficient means to effectuate this, and it is safe to argue that they have in fact been designed specifically for this purpose—that is, to mold public perception.

Naturally though, this is being done in a very underhanded kind of way. As with science, it doesn’t really require a full-scale infiltration. Once the mindset (or the norm) has been established, the entertainment industry, to a large extent, will conform to the agenda virtually on its own accord. Further influence and direction is exerted through the appropriation of certain key positions, naturally the overarching ones, which are secured via secret society networks already in place and interwoven throughout the higher echelons. Their methodology, in the broad sense anyway, is relatively uncomplicated. The sentiment that is intended to be propagated is embodied within the likable characters and is portrayed throughout as favorable. On the other hand, the sentiment that is discouraged is, for the most part, excluded from film and television entirely. When there are references to it—such as things relating to spirituality and esotericism—there’s more often than not a distinguishable slant which in some way detracts from or cheapens its quality. Through these regular and calculated perversions, the perception of these subjects has become standardized and ultimately misrepresentative of their true essence. As a result, any and all information pertinent to these subjects is now linked to the orthodox conception and carries along its designedly unappealing stigma—effectively debarring it from serious consideration.

To expand on this, take for instance the paranormal, which is perhaps the epitome of this whole design. This subject should very conceivably have the undivided attention of the world—and most particularly the scientists. The reason for this is straightforward: Genuine ascertainment of anomalous phenomena potentially reflects a major deficiency in our understanding of reality. In other words, it reveals that we may be wrong—in perhaps a big way—and which of course would, in turn, have big implications. In spite of this though, we have a remarkably different situation. The subject, on the whole, is regarded as frivolous and, rather confusingly, as having little or no value in the furtherance of our knowledge. This is beyond any shadow of a doubt peculiar and should have us very curious as to how it could be so easily dismissed. The answer, I think we can be fairly certain, has quite a lot to do with our inculcated perception, via the entertainment industry. As a useful exercise, just for a moment strip away the attached connotation of the paranormal. Imagine that there had never been corny ghost movies, low-budget sci-fi films, and likewise all of the modern shows which depreciate it as well. We would of course be left with a very different image that I think would almost surely prompt serious attention. After all, accounts of the paranormal are of an undoubtedly inordinate magnitude—exceeding well beyond what could be explained through mental illness or fabrication. So what we have here basically (scrubbing the connotation) is an unacknowledged presence, ranging both physical and nonphysical, that has been here, right in our midst, over pretty much the whole period of our existence (a fairly substantial contingency). And so my point here is that, from an alternate perspective, this particular framing of the paranormal is perhaps a bit conspicuous and seems conveniently to have engendered not only incredulity but also a kind of casual attitude—and in respect to a subject that should legitimately be of great concern to the human species.

In concert with this agenda and as key progenitor of the mainstream mindset, we must of course turn our attention to the “mainstream media”. On the exterior, indeed, it truly does convey a sense of professionalism and authenticity. And yes, admittedly, it does seem to have persuaded a large quantity of intelligent humans—who the general public no doubt presume are of enough discernment to know if it were fraud. It is this fact, incidentally, that perpetuates confidence that we’re being told the truth. We all feel that if the media was really a deception, then surely smart people would by now have come to the fore and explained this to us. It’s just too hard for the average man to fathom that the entire population, intellectuals and all, could be so thoroughly hoodwinked and on such a massive scale. However, it is in fact this perception of implausibility that ultimately enables its possibility. What I mean is that if the world’s media hadn’t already been corrupted, an elite consortium (possessing the capability) could go right ahead and achieve this with very little trouble. There would be no interference from the public, because (due to the mindset/barrier) they have already predetermined that this is too unrealistic and would therefore make no endeavor to investigate. And so we have here, once again, in a very clear-cut way, the shortcoming of the mindset. It can unfortunately be exploited and quite easily turned to advantage.

Now in terms of the smart humans who, in the event of a deception, would theoretically spring up to notify us—the fact of the matter is this has long since already occurred. The mainstream, however, is unaware of this because, unfortunately, they have only been monitoring mainstream channels of information—and not unexpectedly, the mainstream is prohibitive of such news stories. The smart humans have had no choice but to try to alert us through alternative means, namely the internet, the only unrestricted outlet we have. Convenient for the system though—and not by accident—the internet has been branded as “untrustworthy”. The notion smoothly circulates around via the clever catch phrase “don’t believe what you hear on the internet”. It’s a farcical statement though because, of course, the internet is not one particular information source but a medium. It’s about as indistinct as saying “don’t believe what you hear on the telephone”. All the same though, this unfair sentiment has more or less disqualified the entire alternative news media in the eyes of the public—relegating them exclusively to mainstream outlets. Now how intelligent is it that literally the whole of the population has enclosed itself into a system of information controlled by a handful of people? I think it’s within reason to say that this is reckless—and perhaps a bit foolhardy.

In addition, it must be remembered that as a business the media of course caters to the majority. So unless one is seriously of the mind that the common people are actually in line with the true state of things, perhaps then the mainstream isn’t the ideal place to locate truth. After all, does the content of the media truly reflect deep knowledge of society? I think that with just a cursory examination, it must be agreed that it does not. Setting aside the manipulation, it seems plain that this is cosmetically designed trivia which appears distinctly remiss on questions of true significance. Notable as well is the glaring lack of genuine vigilance. It just cannot be stated with sincerity that these expert journalists are truly on task and in scrutiny of legitimate issues. The crucial oversight here is their belief that heads of state are the final arbiters of power. This is very plausibly an invalid premise which of course would mean that the entire media has been grossly off track and their reporting of very little consequence. We should ask sincerely—what of this strange inattention to the billionaires of our society? Should we really not concern ourselves with the subject of unchecked power? Perhaps there’s a little more than just lobbying going on. Maybe it really isn’t so unimaginable that behind the scenes there could be something extensive that we didn’t know about—an interrelationship, perhaps, between government and powerful families that is deep-rooted and pre-existent to the modern era. Should it really surprise us that there could be large-scale collusion—given especially the historic relationship between power and corruption?

Shifting course here, I’d like to call attention to what I think is veritably the most distinguishable and perhaps bizarre characteristic of the mainstream sentiment: That is, the extraordinary and almost universal lack of interest in the nature of our reality. Allow me to delineate: We’ve been spawned into “existence”. It is this black void of stupendous proportion which is sparsely populated with these mysterious balls of hydrogen. Deep inside, we find ourselves gravitationally clung to a large rotating sphere of rock which is circling around one of these mysterious balls. Having a mind and conscious awareness, you would naturally think that the foremost concern would be—what the hell is going on here? Although, shockingly, this concern is entirely absent. In fact, it rarely if ever enters the mind—at least not in any serious or contemplative way. In place of this interest—somewhat disconcertingly—we find ourselves thoroughly captivated by what certainly qualifies as meaningless, trivial rubbish. Namely, our material belongings: ornamental objects, electronic gadgets, wheeled vehicles, etc.—insignificant “niceties” basically. This weird unconcern should genuinely confound us quite simply because we don’t know what this strange setting is exactly—we’ve never been informed. And so, in all seriousness, can we really in fact refer to ourselves as truly being conscious given this extreme inobservance? Perhaps Orwell’s expression regarding the 1984 society can be equally applied to our own: “Orthodoxy is unconsciousness”.

It’s important to understand though that we did not by any means fall into this stupor unassisted. The truth is that we have been “knocked” unconscious. The mainstream mindset was a premeditated infliction designed to incapacitate us spiritually while at the same time rendering us inattentive to the overarching manipulation. Ultimately, it is the central component of a control system. It may be hard to fathom, but on the broad level human society has been annexed and is being used for very recondite purposes. We are being subjugated and though it isn’t obvious, we are under a kind of restraint. This isn’t recognized because it concerns an aspect of ourselves that is being concealed by the barrier and also because we have no conception of normal conditions. This restraint is holding back what has been termed as our “vibrational frequency”—which, for practical purposes, can be equated with our level of spiritual advancement. Because of the nature of the control system—requiring fear-based thinking and diminished awareness—it is necessary that we are kept in a lower frequency range, otherwise this would not be possible. The manner in which we are kept in this low frequency range is largely by influencing behavior so that it is unconducive to spiritual development. To facilitate this, it follows that a collective mindset be created.

As the means to create a collective mindset, a disposition of inordinate judgementality must first be engendered. This fine trait I suspect we have derived largely from religion or, more directly, from the misguided notion that there are precise and fixed doctrines that we must follow in order to be in the right with God. This expanded our conception of right and wrong to encompass behaviors which are benign and at the same time gave rise to societal rules of conduct. It essentially created a system where conformance is rewarded and where nonconformance is judged as being “wrong”—and thereby shunned. Because of these consequences for being in the wrong (or merely different), naturally everyone flocks to the norm and falls into a kind of “herd-mentality”. For the purposes of control, this kind of tendency is almost a prerequisite. It enables an apparatus of centralized control by means of manufacturing the norm and setting its confines. What’s significant here is that the enforcement of this control is largely being carried out by ourselves. When a person crosses the boundary of the norm and starts to diverge in their thinking, what ultimately stops them is not any kind of authority but their own family and friends. As their views become disclosed, they are invariably met with almost automated disparagement. There is never a thoughtful attempt to discern their reasoning. A conclusion is instantly drawn that the person must surely be incorrect (or insane) because these views are at variance with conventionality and what we have been told in school. The dissenting individual therefore, having just a sample of this discomfort, immediately heads back to the cover of the norm and returns to conformity.

And so, when these constraints have been set up and the whole of society begins singing from the same songbook, it is only a matter of adjusting this songbook that you can direct and ultimately cultivate their behavior. As I mentioned, the central purpose of this was to bring about a cessation or decline in human spiritual development so as to enable control. The most contributive element to this aim is our extreme disharmony with the natural world. As it so happens, everything in the universe is integrated via energetic fields, and it is for this reason that the fundamental requisite for spiritual advancement entails harmony with nature. The architects of the manipulation, comprehending this, appear to have engineered the mindset to be intrinsically discordant with this reality. On the whole, I would speculate that this was largely a matter of framing society around material aspiration, which naturally would bring about excessive exploitation. This may seem instinctual and just a product of human nature, however, on reflection, it’s possible that this condition prevails only due to our deficient understanding of reality. If you detract from knowledge the true understanding of the human identity and ourselves as “soul” (an undying energetic material) and displace this with the notion of mortality and the belief of only one lifetime—then it’s fairly predictable that this would ultimately give rise to a kind of selfish nonchalance, where man’s only concern is material gratification. All that’s further needed is the smug perception that we’re of an exalted status and have been bestowed with divine authority to rule over and tyrannize all of creation. By instilling such qualities which are adverse to universal integrity, you can in fact counter the normal development of soul essence matter—which essentially undercuts our collective frequency level, confining us to a lower-vibrational status for an indefinite time frame.

Before drawing this essay to a close, I would like briefly to address the impending question of—where are my grounds? I am not unaware of the fact that I’ve largely been writing on the affirmative and leaving out much of the supporting information. The intention of this paper was not to recite the already circulated evidence, but rather to provide tenable insights which would demonstrate that there is advisability in questioning the mainstream conception. As for the veracity of large-scale manipulation and its metaphysical foundation, I would direct you to the insiders themselves for this—of which there are now substantial numbers. Practically speaking, it is really the only way in which one can begin to conceive its possibility. The mainstream philosophy has been so firmly implanted that, presented with whatever information, we will generally carry on doubting almost without end. However, if one is an astute observer and takes careful examination of insider testimonies, there are many indications of legitimacy. For one thing, there are too many connecting points of information stemming from independent sources. If this was solely a matter of fanciful “storytelling”, there would be much more of a dissimilarity between accounts than what we’re seeing. At any rate, the idea of fabrication I would say is a fairly doubtful hypothesis to begin with. Referring to what I said previously, there are tough consequences when someone decides to step out of the norm and contrary to what some may believe, negative attention is most often undesired. With regard to claims that these are people who suffer from mental illnesses, this is egregiously mistaken and demonstrates a very crude understanding of human behavior on the part of those who would designate them as such.

In summary of this, I would emphasize the following regarding the mindset:

● It is (by design) inherently unsuspecting.
● It relegates its thinking to an outside source but makes no endeavor to investigate its reliability.
● It has predeterminately ruled out alternative ideas without any attempt to ascertain their viability.
● It has, without justification, ruled out virtually all contingencies pertaining to conspiracy and intrigue.
● It habitually acquiesces to conformity, even when it’s in opposition to our true feelings.
● It glosses over everything that is of true significance and, instead, hones in on the mundane.
● It is the underlying factor which has allowed for our control and, by doing so, has brought about a very daunting situation for humankind and the planet.

On consideration of this, I think we can call into question the merit of the mainstream mindset. On the surface of course, it would seem to be a practical way of thinking: We accept what the authorities and experts tell us because they seem genuine and in good faith. We focus our lives on comfort and entertainment because we presume that physical life is finite. We don’t stray too far from normal social bounds because we dislike ridicule and desire approval from our peers. It all seems reasonable and justified, however, only in relationship to the orthodox view of reality. If it just so happens that the orthodox view doesn’t conform to fact—and if even just a small percentage of what insiders say is true—then, suffice it to say, the normal way in which we’ve been conducting ourselves is terribly unsound. It desperately needs to be uncovered that the spiritual component of reality is genuine. The development and maintenance of the soul is not merely just a beneficial activity, but is quite veritably the fundamental purpose of life. To be clear, the spiritual problem is not that we are all indisposed to meditate, but rather that we are complicit in a somewhat severe form of planetary degradation. It is true that we are being underhandedly coerced, however, due to the evasive techniques in how it is being conducted, we are still largely responsible and subject to the spiritual consequences. It isn’t entirely practicable that we could swiftly persuade the masses to pull away from things like factory farming and other forms of abuse—though the awakening humans, which are in great numbers, should be readily able to accomplish these things. In such event, the upgrade in our individual frequency (due the interconnection of energy fields) would in turn elevate the collective frequency level, conceivably resulting in a global shift in consciousness—which ultimately would give rise to an increased regard for the planet and its lifeforms. The predicament, however, is that there are too many of us who still concede to the norm, which interferes considerably with these endeavors. Simply put, the possibility of falling out of favor with the in-crowd is just too much of an unpleasant consequence for us. On this matter, I would bring to mind that there is without any doubt a significant disparity between popularity and perspicacity—and that, given the society we find ourselves in, the two are perhaps not very compatible. In light of everything, I’d say it’s clear that the mainstream mindset is not at all the prudent mode of operation it is seen to be, but is perhaps rather inept—and particularly so in dealing with the exigencies of human sovereignty. For these reasons, I suggest that we depart from the mainstream entirely—and in the process, seed the notion (as respectfully as we can) that orthodoxy is more or less naiveté and that closed-mindedness is actually thoughtlessness.

“Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.” -Mark Twain

Receive News from Operation Disclosure via Email