Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to applying these following rules.

The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"

- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top

Send your entry and speak out today!

News Alerts


Current Overview:

(Disclaimer: The following is an overview of the current situation based on rumors from several sources which may or may not be truthful or accurate.)

- Israel is attempting to start a war in the Middle East by attacking Iran's assets in Syria.

- Iran is furious but Russia and China are holding them back from retaliating.

- The Cabal are desperately attempting to ignite War World 3 to significantly delay the transition event.

- Nothing has been delayed as their attempts have been unsuccessful thanks to the Alliance.

- The signing of a peace treaty in the Korean Peninsula is underway which is a prerequisite to GESARA.

- The RV is the last on the list needed events, right before GESARA.

- We're at the end of that list.

- The RV remains set to begin at any moment.

- The status of RV exchange Tiers 1-2 is unknown.

- Tier 3 has not exchanged/redeemed. There are thousands of groups categorized under Tier 3.

- Once Tier 3 is done, the toll-free 800 numbers will be activated, released, and published which will begin Tier 4 exchanges/redemptions.

- All Tiers are expected to exchange/redeem within a time-span of 2 months once the RV begins.




Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR as of April 19, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR Update as of April 19 2018 Compiled 12:01 am EDT 18 April 2018 by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Ab...

Sunday, February 21, 2016

Israel Is Changing Its Approach to Syria War

Facing Assad's Battleground Advances, Israel Is Changing Its Approach to Syria War

Advances, Israel Is Changing Its Approach to Syria War

Russian intervention has tilted the scales, and Jerusalem is concerned of a regime victory, which would be victory for Iran as well. To prevent that, Israeli official believe West must intervene in favor of moderate rebels.

Amos Harel Feb 21, 2016 5:16 AM

Syrian army troops fire rocket at ISIS posts near Raqqa, Syria, this week.

The Cold War is warming up again – in Syria
The secret you’re not being told about ISIS
Russia pulls Syrian rug from under Iran’s feet

Throughout most of the civil war in Syria Israel has maintained a more or less consistent policy. Now, in light of the Assad regime’s successes, assisted by Russia and Iran, Israel’s approach to events in Syria seems about to change. The change will not be translated into military action, but it is clear that the progress of the regime and its supporters, coupled with a lack of initiative by Western countries, are sources of concern and criticism in Jerusalem.

So far, while paying lip service publicly to the suffering of the Syrian people in the civil war, which next month will have been raging for five years, Israel has not come out for any side and has kept its involvement to a relative minimum, focusing on defending interests it regards as essential.

Israel has pledged to respond militarily to any attack on its territory (and did so on a number of occasions). It also said it would act to stop the smuggling of advanced weaponry from Syria to Hezbollah in Lebanon (and according to foreign media reports, has indeed done so on numerous occasions). Israel also offered humanitarian aid to villages on the Syrian side of the border in the Golan Heights. In exchange, local rebel Sunni militias have kept extremist organizations that could attack Israel away from the areas under their control.

Syrian President Bashar Assad

Syrian President Bashar Assad, speaking during an interview with the Iran's Khabar TV, in Damascus, Syria, Sunday, Oct. 4, 2015.AP

In fact, the war in Syria has largely served Israel’s interests. The ongoing fighting has worn down the Syrian army to a shadow of its former capabilities. Almost all of President Bashar Assad’s huge store of chemical weapons has been dismantled following an American-Russian arrangement forced on the Syrian dictator in the summer of 2013.

And Hezbollah, Israel’s main adversary in the north, has invested a quarter to a third of its manpower in fighting for the Syrian regime, and is losing dozens of fighters every month in battle. Official spokespeople do not say this publicly – there are things one cannot say when 470,000 people (according to recent accepted figures) are being massacred across the border – but Israel has been quietly wishing success to both sides and would not have been against the bloodletting continuing for a few more years without a clear victor.

The change in Syria came with the arrival of Russian aircraft to Assad’s aid in late August 2015 and the launching of heavy bombings a month later. Russian bombings are exhausting the rebels and allowing Syrian army forces, assisted by Shi’ite militias, to almost completely surround Aleppo in northern Syria, move closer to Dar’aa in the south and apparently also help in a renewed assault on the Idlib region in the northwest. According to testimony from Syria, the town of Sheikh Maskin near Dar’aa, which the Syrian army took over a few weeks ago, has been almost razed by the bombings.

But three understandings are emerging as Israel updates its positions in light of developments: First, an Assad victory would be bad for Israel because it would also mean victory for Assad’s allies, Iran and Hezbollah. Second, despite the heavy Russian bombings and internal disagreements in its ranks, the Syrian opposition is far from vanquished. The third is that the West must rouse itself from its inaction and try to send real military aid to what Israeli security officials describe as a kind of third force, the less extreme Sunni rebels and the Kurdish militias, so they, too, will stand up against the regime as well as against the Islamic State.

Israel would consider an Assad victory a bad option because it would strengthen Iran, whose standing has already improved since the nuclear agreement in Vienna in July, lifting of sanctions and relative warming of ties between Tehran and the West. The regime’s takeover of southern Syria, especially the border of the Golan Heights, 90 percent of which is under rebel control, would once again create a line of contact with Hezbollah and the Iranian Revolutionary Guards in Syrian territory.

Although intelligence predictions are not uniform, Israel’s security leaders tend to assume that it is too early to declare an Assad victory. The main conclusion is that the regime has stabilized and the likelihood that it will fall, as long as Russia is providing such extensive military assistance, has declined greatly.

The West has not formulated a clear strategy in light of Russian military intervention in Syria and is focusing on two defensive objectives – stopping the wave of refugees to Europe and preventing additional terror attacks by Sunni jihadist groups in Western countries. Although American efforts against ISIS in Iraq and Syria have borne some fruit, Washington and Europe are helpless in light of Assad’s improved position.

Israel’s position is that not only is there still something to be done in Syria, but that this involvement is essential to allow the less extremist groups to survive, to stop the regime’s progress and the rise in Iran’s standing.

Amos Harel

Haaretz Correspondent
read more:

Receive News from Operation Disclosure via Email

Shoutbox Disclaimer

Please be advised that the Shoutbox is NOT moderated. Use it at your own will.