Guest Posting

If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.


The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"

- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top

Send your entry and speak out today!

Featured Post

Restored Republic via a GCR as of Aug 17, 2018

Restored Republic via a GCR: Update as of Aug 17, 2018 Compiled 17 Aug. 12:01 am EST by Judy Byington, MSW, LCSW, ret. CEO, Child Abuse Re...

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Anna Von Reitz Articles -- May 15, 2018

http://www.paulstramer.net/

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

The Long and Short of It All -- Part 2



By Anna Von Reitz

All you currently active duty and reserve and retired United States Marines out there-- what was it you were shouting every day of your Marine training?

Was it, "I am an American!" --- or was it, "I am a United States Citizen!"?

All you United States Army guys --- which one are you?

This same question applies to the Air Force, the Navy, even the Coast Guard.

The answer determines whether you are an American and an honorable member of the American Armed Forces or you are acting in the capacity of a filthy commercial mercenary -- albeit, not getting the big bucks of merc wages.

Did anyone ever tell you that when you signed up to enter military service you were enrolled as a mercenary in the employment of commercial corporations and given a share in the profits via a stock portfolio? No?

No doubt this is coming as Big News, but yes, the rats set you up with a stock portfolio they were supposed to give to you when you left military service. The catch is that so far as their records show, you never left their jurisdiction.

This is another example of the criminality infesting every aspect of the "government" corporations --- your DD214 is not a discharge from "US citizenship". So you are still snagged.

You have to go back to the head of your branch of service and serve Notice that you have returned to your birthright political status as an American State Citizen. Otherwise, they just presume that you are a "Lifer" and still obligated to bow, scrape, and salute. And they just keep your stock portfolio and manage it "for" you until you die, at which point they claim it as "abandoned property".

And you thought you were serving your country all the while you were serving the "US CORP". Nobody told you any different, either. Until now.

So fire up your writing instruments and re-convey your Trade Names to the land and soil of the state where you were born (www.annavonreitz.com, Article #928, Editable pdfs) and give Notice that you left "US Citizenship" behind effective the date of "Discharge" noted on your DD214 and you are owed a stock portfolio and/or income therefrom earned while unwittingly employed as a commercial mercenary.

Direct the Service Branch Office to update your political status records and forward your claim to the Office of Military Settlements. That should put a bulwark in the retirement resources of a lot of American veterans. And when you get a chance, say, thank you, to the True God. The rats didn't intend for it to be any actual benefit to you. They just wanted to stand around and say, "Gee, look at all these accounts nobody ever collected. What a bunch of patriotic guys!"

----------------------------

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Statehood is a Capacity

By Anna Von Reitz

It really does not matter for the purposes of the Federal Union that Texas came in as a "republic" or a "territory" or a "colony" either --- Texas agreed to act as a State of the Federal Union.

Being a "State" is a capacity --- for example, you might agree to act in the capacity of an elector, or in the capacity of a wife, or in the capacity of employee in a book store.

In the same way the Body Politic of Texas can act as an independent republic, a State Republic, a State, or a State of State, or a Council of County Governments or, or, or.

Having agreed, Texas joined the Union and has been part of the Union as a member-State ever since. If it joined some other Union it might be called a "region" or a "borough" or a "principality".

So in its own internal affairs, Texas functions as a republic--- as all the State Republics are supposed to (though largely don't) and with respect to its relationship with the other States functions as a State of the Federal Union.

I wish people would take the time to understand capacity. It's really not that foreign to us. We all act in different capacities all the time. Why is it difficult to conceive of our government acting in different capacities? Especially when it is right in front of us? We can literally see that "Ohio" is different than "State of Ohio"---right? So why don't people pick up on that fact?

I spend a good deal of time explaining the fact that The Texas Republic is a different entity from The Republic of Texas, which is a different entity from Texas, which is different from Texas State, which is different from The State of Texas, which is different from the State of Texas, which is different from the state of texas, which is different from the STATE OF TEXAS or TEXAS...... and you can plug in any other state in place of "Texas" and find the same array of capacities.

----------------------------

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

The [Municipal] United States Corporation -- a Lesson About Larry Becraft

By Anna Von Reitz

Here's a good example of how attorneys deliberately avoid and obscure the actual truth and substance of things. Larry finds an obscure reference somewhere in my writings to the Act of 1871. It was probably a quote from someone else or part of a list of historical actions undertaken by Congress --- he doesn't say, so it's impossible to know where he picked this bit up, whether it is in context or not, but he quotes it as something I referenced:

Larry:

Contrary to your present denial, I have specifically quoted an article you wrote that was posted on Crackpot Arnie's website, which is as follows:

Claim 15. 1871: The Corporate Congress begins to set up shop for itself by creating a separate government for the District of Columbia. The initial effort fails but seven years later the Washington DC Municipality is created as an independent international city state run as a plenary oligarchy by the members of “Congress”. Also in 1871, the Corporate Congress claimed to own all United States corporations— 41st “Congress”– Third Session, Chapters 62, 63, 64, and 65.

Anna:

Yes, Larry, Congress did do exactly what I said it did and what a lot of other patriots have said it did --- the fact that the unpopularity of their action forced them to repeal the original Act three years later, and caused them to cut it up and pass its substance in a piecemeal fashion in 1878 -- is the kind of hair-splitting and deliberate avoidance of the basic truth that does you no credit.

Here for your education --- AGAIN --- is the entire, truthful history of the Act of 1871:

1871 - Act of 1871 ---“An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 62, 16 Stat. 419, February 21, 1871 ---which was repealed in 1874 and then passed piecemeal via these actions---- “An Act Providing a Permanent Form of Government for the District of Columbia,” ch. 180, sec. 1, 20 Stat. 102, June 11, 1878, to remain and continue as a municipal corporation (brought forward from the Act of 1871, as provided in the Act of March 2, 1877, amended and approved March 9, 1878, Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to the District of Columbia . . . 1873–’74 (in force as of December 1, 1873), sec. 2, p. 2); as amended by the Act of June 28, 1935, 49 Stat. 430, ch. 332, sec. 1 (Title 1, Section 102, District of Columbia Code (1940)).

It doesn't really matter, Larry, that the original Act was repealed and then passed in pieces later --- what matters is the substance of the Act, which is apparently what you wish to avoid and gainsay: the creation of the US Corp.

And it can only be the creation of the US Corp that we are looking at, Larry, because: the District of Columbia was set up in 1790 and fully chartered by 1801, so there was no need to do that in 1871 or 1874 or 1878.

Nowadays, Larry, it isn't necessary to dig up the entire history of the Act of 1871 to prove that the US Corp exists. It was emblazoned on every fork and spoon issued to the US Military throughout World War II, painted on canteens, and spray-painted on jeeps. There are thousands upon thousands of such "admissions" available to anyone who cares to look.

And as if that were not enough, there are many different commercial registries all over the planet. Dunn and Bradstreet is just one such registry that people can look up from their comfort of their computer console and see for themselves that yes, indeed, what we think of as "the government" is in fact functioning as a commercial corporation in the business of providing "essential government services".

A small sampling of around a hundred of the DUNNS numbers belonging to the US Corp are listed in the Appendix in the back of my book, "You Know Something Is Wrong When", and with a little poking on search engines like Manta.com, Edgar.com and Thomas.com people can discover the CAGE and EIN and other proofs of the commercial nature of such things as the "US GOVERNMENT" and the "BLM" and the "STATE OF OHIO".

People can also search the data bases of the State of Delaware, where most of these corporations maintain registration. It's all online, Larry. No need to try to obfuscate or hide the truth anymore.

And while people are at it, they can look up the Clearfield Doctrine, which very clearly enunciates the principle of the law which says that when a government steps down and functions in the capacity of a corporation, it is subject to all the same limitations as any other corporation.

As everyone, even Bob Hurt, can now see, Larry's hair-splitting does him no credit and serves no truth. He is simply obfuscating and trying to avoid admission of the fact that the Act of 1871 led to the creation -- howbeit, seven years later -- of the Municipal Corporation of the District of Columbia, more popularly known by its dba "US Corp".

Well, there it is, folks --- the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the Act of 1871, for your knowledge and enjoyment --- so that when some hair-splitting shyster tries to tell you that the Act of 1871 was repeated in 1874 (which it was) you are prepared to tell him the rest of the story just as I told it to Larry.

And I trust that my credibility on the matter now stands heads and tails and nose and whiskers above anything Mr. Becraft might have (left) to say.

----------------------------

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

The Long and Short of All of It

By Anna Von Reitz

Either these people are: (a) my employees, owing me good faith service, or (b) they are foreign commercial mercenaries trespassing upon me and engaging in inland piracy.

In the first case, they are obligated to honor and protect my person and property. That is the only credible reason for any government to exist.

In the second case, they are pirates and every anti-piracy law ever created kicks into gear, including the international treaties that directly obligate both the Holy Sea and the British Monarch and their respective organizations to protect my person and property.

Read that: Checkmate.

----------------------------

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Here It Is AGAIN for All Those Who Need to Know

By Anna Von Reitz

There is a widespread swath of gross ignorance in America populated by True Believers who think that they know all they need to know and devil take the hindmost.

No doubt that is comforting to them and they cling to their suppositions accordingly, like Linus clinging to his Blanket.

---Until, that is, they land in a "US District Court" and are told that they have no constitutional guarantees and other wake up calls come due.

For all of those who think that I am a "Patriot Guru" and that I can't possibly know what I am talking about despite the abundant factual and actual proof that I do (admittedly not paying federal income tax since 1998, for example) here is a compilation of primary source quotes from people as diverse as Frederick Douglas and JFK in support of the information I am giving you---300 pages worth:

https://www.scribd.com/document/100879878/We-The-Sheeple-Vs-the-Banksters

----------------------------

See this article and over 1000 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.

Receive News from Operation Disclosure via Email